this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
198 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2879 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 24 points 1 month ago

on one side is a bright green future for all humankind

If only it were on one side. It's on neither.

Already voted for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Why does anyone believe anyone is on the fence right now?

There are people who had made up their minds months ago, or longer, and cowards.

[–] Omegamanthethird 6 points 1 month ago

It's been 4 years since Trump left office, 8 years since he took office. And people don't pay as much attention as we do. They legitimately don't remember how bad his presidency was.

The single most destructive thing he did was pack the courts with radicals (largely thanks to McConnell blocking Obama's last two years). And nobody even talks about that, nor would a centrist care about the judicial system.

However I have heard these people criticize him for one thing, no climate agenda.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe they're waiting on that promotion that ups their salary to $914,900 to decide?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cowards is right. The differences are clear so people that don't vote are simply afraid of making a choice that will affect future generations.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 3 points 1 month ago

If the vote is between democracy and authoritarianism, and you choose not to vote, you've chosen authoritarianism. I will die on that hill.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And people who don't pay attention

[–] chaonaut -2 points 1 month ago

Not so much on the fence between Harris and Trump, but on the bench, because apparently a significant demographic in my state is apparently not all that important to winning the swing state, and have been being iced out since before Harris was on the top of the ticket. Perhaps it is a failing of character to be unable to look past the continuing apologetics and support for a genocide and the emphasis on courting the "good" Republicans over the Progressives, but I can't just set that aside and pour my energy into cheerleading the presidential race. I don't have an option that I want, I have a choice between the status quo (which we know is leading us into bad places) and actively making things worse.

[–] NickwithaC 0 points 1 month ago

That video is an audible assault! Holy shit.