this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
954 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19085 readers
4209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We see it now: The hate has shifted to the trans community,” Walz said. “They see that as an opportunity. If you’re watching any sporting events right now, you see that Donald Trump’s closing arguments are to demonize a group of people for being who they are.”

“We’re out there trying to make the case that access to healthcare, a clean environment, manufacturing jobs, and keeping your local hospital open are what people are really concerned about,” he continued. “They’re running millions of dollars of ads demonizing folks who are just trying to live their lives.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, in the US, demonizing groups of people works. It gets voters to the polls. In 2028, it will just be the next group in line. It never ends.

[–] JeeBaiChow 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what a man looks like. Defending the persecuted because it matters, not a wimp hiding behind his daddy's fortune or a loaded gun.

[–] Dainterhawk999 0 points 20 hours ago

Or in front of a loaded gun

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Walz is so much better than Kamala, so I'll be voting because of Walz.

[–] themeatbridge 8 points 1 day ago

I like to imagine the primary we could have had if Biden had not insisted he could handle a campaign. But I also think Walz would not have been able to separate from the fracas of a Battle Royale. Kamala would have won, but who knows if she would have been battle-hardened or beat up.

[–] funkyfarmington 65 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Tim Walz is the Captain Picard we've needed for a long time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 15 points 1 day ago

This comment makes me happy I put a Star Trek stamp on my mail in ballot

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 207 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (23 children)

I'm honestly heartened to hear Waltz specfically voice support for trans folk. This is opposed to Harris who said she would follow the law in regards to my community, which sounds good but I need everyone to understand that it could be said by a governor in a southern state enforcing anti trans legislation. Waltz actually went the distance to say we should to be legally left alone. There is a stark difference between these two statements, even if I glad to hear both.

[–] JohnnyH842 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey not trying to be an internet jerk, just wanted to point out that his last name is Walz not "Waltz". Hope you have a great day.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh dang, you're totally right! I honestly appreciate ya pointing that out, thank you and have a great day as well! ♥️

[–] tbird83ii 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, the news can't seem to get it correct, so i get your confusion. They also pronounce it "waltz".

Its really pronounced like "walls".

[–] andros_rex 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly called the gov office right after he got the nomination.

I’m a teacher, I want to still be at least, but they’ve made it dangerous for trans people to exist in Oklahoma. There’s currently a court hold on ANY investigation based on gender identity discrimination in schools.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›