this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
288 points (93.6% liked)

Jobs

250 readers
113 users here now

A community to discuss jobs, whether that's regarding to the search, advice on how to negotiate an offer, or just an open forum to vent.

This is not a place intended for you to post job listings.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ve been to interviews that were literally scams. Nah man you have to provide the good faith effort on your end too.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

lol so have I. Went to an interview for a warehouse job when I was 18 and it turned out to be an attempt to get me to sell vacuums that was also an amway style pyramid scheme. Fuck those people for wasting my time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've heard of restaurants that have applicants do a 'trial' shift for no pay, and then never call back. They manage to line up a new person every night this way.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I found out somewhere was doing that I would report them to whoever I could

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also plant a bomb under the kitchen

[–] barsquid 4 points 1 day ago

You'd be blasting the laborers, though. The person responsible is at home doing zero work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trial shifts are a thing, but at least in the US they have to be paid to be legal. And wage theft, if reported, actually results in penalties for the fraudulent employer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I had thousands stolen from me in unpaid wages a few years ago and nothing happened when I reported it. Our institutions in the US are crumbling a little more year after year

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

This is LinkedIn isn’t it? This exactly the trash you’d expect from tech bros choosing this as their social media platform of choice. Reminder: Microsoft owns LinkedIn & you can delete your account today (since 90% of your messages & recruitement is spam/trash).

[–] slickgoat 4 points 1 day ago

One doesn't just delete LinkedIn. In fact, one can't totally. Once it's got its claws into you, your hooked with steel barbs. It's easier to escape ebola.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (11 children)

For those complaining that it's a terrible idea, and it may well be, have your ever been on the receiving end of shotgunned resumes?

What's a good solution to this?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Phegan 4 points 1 day ago

This is the most entitled white guy take.

[–] shalafi 10 points 1 day ago

I might pay a small fee for a guaranteed interview. If I can get in front of someone, I usually score. OTOH, I'd never trust a company doing this, so...

[–] OpenHammer6677 31 points 2 days ago

Thought exercise lmao

[–] lukstru 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get that it's annoying to have a lot of (obviously) under qualified applications, and someone has to go through them. I just don't think it's possible to solve this problem without being unfair to at least some applicants.

More contextI was part of a hiring committee for a professor job at an European university last year. The job description was clear enough that you got the vibe "this is a high profile job. Only apply if you think you really are high profile for a European university."

And we got soooo many trash applications, we rejected more than 90% in the first screening. Some obvious ones, and some less obvious ones. The obvious ones were the most annoying, because wtf is that application. One that will always stay in my mind is the application of an already established professor, which consisted only of a CV that looked like a 3 year old glued it together and someone replicated that in Power Point in 2003. I was so confused about this application, because how tf did this person think this was enough? They're an established professor! They really should know how applications work.

So yeah, I get that there are a lot of annoying applications coming in that feel like a waste of time for everyone. Asking money to apply will not help tho.

Maybe hire someone to help with the applications..? No wait, then you'd have to go through even more applications. /s

[–] n0clue 4 points 1 day ago

The job description was clear enough that you got the vibe "this is a high profile job. Only apply if you think you really are high profile for a European university."

Lol I apply for things like that cause what the fuck are they doing on Indeed?

[–] over_clox 21 points 2 days ago

Time is money. Even if I don't get the job, I feel I should still get paid a minimum of an hourly wage for the waste of my time.

[–] TommySoda 18 points 2 days ago

I need money. Too bad I don't have any money.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 10 points 2 days ago

Exchange ideas by listening to mine, avoid criticism by labeling it vitriol.

I would gladly pay for him to briefly notice and reject me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I paid an application fee to apply for the local electrical union JATC

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Although this is obviously a dumb solution, I do get what he's saying. Part of why the job market is so bad right now, is that there is a lot of people (often with the help of automation) sending out applications in bulk to companies they fail to meet even bare minimum requirements for. For example, its anecdotal, but a local company has given up on public postings because last time they tried, they received thousands of applications in a single day (most of which with no qualifications) and the ones they tried to reach out to weren't even in the country. There are a lot of ways to help filter this, but it just highlights what a mess things are right now.

[–] partial_accumen 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Part of why the job market is so bad right now, is that there is a lot of people (often with the help of automation) sending out applications in bulk to companies they fail to meet even bare minimum requirements for.

But this is a direct result of employers actions with incomplete or deceptive job postings, bad faith interviews, and ghosting prospective candidates.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Employers aren't a collective either though, and while abusive employers drive workers to this, more desirable positions (often with better companies) are the ones who bear the brunt of this. The new doctors office looking to hire staff at a fair rate shouldn't be punished because every McDonald's on the planet abuses their workforce, nor should the workers who are actually able to work and now have a harder time finding work.

[–] partial_accumen 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The new doctors office looking to hire staff at a fair rate shouldn’t be punished because every McDonald’s on the planet abuses their workforce

I'm not sure why you're bringing "fairness" into this. We're not talking about one group that has wronged another. These are human behaviors and reaction to prior behaviors. There's no system in place to enforce "fairness" in the way you're talking about.

If you're advocating for such a system to be created, then there's some possibilities there such as employers certifying (under penalty of law) to treat employee candidates with certain rights, and likewise employee candidates could be certifed to actually hold the credentials the employer is requiring for the position. All of those rules will have to be set up and agreed to, and will cost money which has to come from somewhere. As of today, none of this exists. There is no entity enforcing "fairness" in the posting of positions or the application to those positions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Employers aren’t a collective either though

And here lies the fucking problem.

Grow some fucking solidarity, bootlicker, you have more in common with a sweatshop worker in Sri Lanka than you do with your CEO.

E: I'm still waking up and misread "employer" for "employee", but my point still stands: you're a bootlicker who needs to grow some solidarity and realise that your employer sees you, and every other employee, as nothing but a dollar sign there to make them money, no matter how many times they tell you you're "family". Their interests will never deliberately intersect with yours unless it is so you produce more value for them.

Workers of the world unite.

Fuck self serving bootlickers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm literally just compaining that the system as a whole has fallen apart. I don't blame people for automated mass applications. Its the logical way to apply in this landscale, and doubly so if you're trying to escape an even more hyper-capitalist country. I just want people to be able to pay their bills, and as it stands, that means finding a job. If wanting to be able to feed my family makes me a bootlicker, so be it.

[–] RedditWanderer 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the cost of the companies hiring and firing a fuckton of people at once. If they don't want that, they can give us stability. If they dont like the mass posting on their platforms, they can start having a more humane process.

Shoving it onto the consumer is just dumb. Plenty of very qualified people need to apply to hundreds of jobs to get one. Plenty of companies wasting time posting jobs they'll never fill. He didn't think this through one bit, and hiding the criticism behind "it's just a thought" doesn't make the criticism less valid.

It also tells us a lot about him for even thinking it was an idea. He's completely disconnected with the realities of job hunting and the market.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Saying the problem is just because people hire and fire too often is such a massive oversimplification. If that was the main factor, the market wouldn't be anywhere near as bad as it is, and it wouldn't take hundreds of applications just to get an interview. Theres a whole plethora of issues from governments of developed nations usually adding loopholes to labor laws for foreign workers to supress wages, to the complete lack of competition/antitrust enforcement, to the increased push from companies and moronic liberatarians to remove social safety nets forcing people into abusive jobs, to the number of buinesses that have discovered that they can just use postings to collect valuable data rather than to hire. This is what has caused the market to break down - bad employee retention doesn't help, but that alone would be a small scale problem that weighs down the company practicing it.

If they dont like the mass posting on their platforms, they can start having a more humane process.

That was the reason I was complaining - even companies trying to hire honestly and humanely can't function at this point. The whole system is starting to come apart because the few at the top are too greedy and incompetent to even attempt to fix things. We need actual, enforced worker protections, and we need those in power to stop trying to prop up megacompanies, or the system will just continue to cave in on itself.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Waaaaaahhhhh :'( We shat in the pool for years and now we can't go swimming because other people think it's okay to shit in our pool, too!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

those poor victimized CEOs...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

nO oNe wAnTs tO WorK aNyMoRe

Points out that companies are no longer advertising jobs.

Still finds a way to blame jobseekers.

Boot can't really taste that good, can it? Not to kink shame, but is it that you simply enjoy being stomped on?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›