Selfhosted

A VPS is already a VM and nesting VMs, even if you get it to work, is generally a Bad Idea™️.

What you're asking for is squarely in "bare metal" territory. Does that reduce your flexibility? Sure. But it doesn't entirely eliminate it. Down the road if you decide you need more RAM or disk those are things you can have added (at a cost). CPU would likely necessitate a migration to a different system so I'd keep that in mind during initial sizing. Also, if you are using proxmox, migration will be as simple as backing up a container/VM and restoring it at the destination.

Your other alternative is multiple VPSes or possibly augmenting the bare metal server with one or more VPSes.

As far as unified billing goes, just have all the services with the same provider. Most providers I've encountered offer both services.

I can't speak to providers in our around Sydney, but I'd recommend checking out lowendbox.com to start your search.

The first thing to check is whether you can install your CAD software on a virtual machine with your current license. If you have good internet at home and already own a CAD machine then it might be easier to setup VPN access and remote control that machine for your Windows needs. Sunshine/Moonlight works good if you have the bandwidth for it.

I don't know how easy it would be to migrate to your own local machine, but what you're describing sounds like Desktop-as-a-Service. All of the major cloud providers offer this in some form.

Get a VPS, wire guard and forward the socket to your home server.

Bare metal is stupid expensive because it's near impossible to administer for them, all you need is a static ip really.

Alternately use a dyndns service and poke holes in your home firewall.

If you don’t have a proper computer, how will you access this remote server to do your CAD work?

I think you're both over- and under-thinking this.

First: if you go with a cloud provider, your provider is your hypervisor. If they don't directly and clearly offer the features (import, export, Windows, etc.) that you need, they're not the right choice.

On the subject of exporting images from the cloud to use locally, eh, that's not the most common feature. It does exist, but I've never seen a provider that does it in a way that's not a complete pain in the ass and/or is simple to use one you have the image, which sounds like something you might actually want. Someone giving you a qcow image of your disk does not necessarily make importing it and getting it back up on a local KVM system easy, for example.

It sounds like half of what you need is a decent laptop (Windows in the cloud kinda sucks for any application that's got any sort of GPU-accelerated component, still.) and the other half is just a Linux server somewhere running docker, be it VM, real hardware, or some box sitting in your closet at home.

(Edit: clarification: you can get a Windows VM that has a proper GPU passed thru to it, but they're expensive and if you don't get a GPU, then you just have basically software rendering, which limits what kind of software you can reasonably use with reasonable performance.)

Nothing you mentioned about your "future home server environment" can't be run on a VM, but I would comment that you're looking at a pretty expensive route if you go the VM path. Nextcloud, for example, will want ~3-4gb of ram to not utterly suck and be useless. A full *arr stack with something like qbittorrent can happily eat another 4-5gb. Add in Plex/Jellyfin? That's another 2-4gb there, too. And so on.

You might actually end up spending less on a dedicated box than you would on a VM, simply because the pricing for things like RAM are usually substantially better for real, actual, physical hardware once you get past like, 4 or 8gb.

I'd also recommend going with a containerized install for all this stuff: I bounce stuff around between servers and it's just a matter of lifting the data out of the bind mount and moving it to it's new home, and then a docker compose up and we're done.

TLDR: Cloud maybe fine, bare metal maybe fine: it comes down to budget and comfort with what you're willing to deal with.

If I was in your shoes I’d probably build my own hypervisor box and rent colo space for it. Strictly because your requirement to migrate VMs to your own system later is more trouble than it’s worth.

I don’t know for sure but I’d guess you would pay less for colo than renting someone’s server for a year or two. Renting bare metal is stupid expensive.

Bare metal server sounds like optimal solution for you and set up a hypervisor on top of it, so it's pretty trivial to migrate VMs to your own hardware when needed. But then for your 'long term' environment VPS would most likely be better and migrating a full VM from your hypervisor to VPS is a bit more work, but can be done.

I don't know about providers in Australia, but Hetzner has both and combined billing and my personal experience with them is pretty good. But I'm in Europe, so bandwidth nor latency is not a problem.

This was the first hit on proxmox vps.

https://hostkey.com/vps/proxmox/

I have no idea if they are good or not, but this kind of service might be what you're looking for?

I would go with Azure especially if you are interested in Windows servers. It will cost you but that's how I would do it if I wasn't using physical hardware.

For Windows on physical hardware you just need the proper license.