this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
513 points (98.5% liked)

hmmm

4785 readers
876 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I think this one's a joke, sure some would say it's no time for humor but I think it's funny.

[–] plz1 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They missed the 25-foot waterproof wall, for the actual damage, the storm surge...

[–] UnmetPlayer 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Just put down some moisture absorbers, it'll be fine.

[–] scutiger 6 points 2 months ago

Just stick it in some rice. Good as new.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

This is actually not a bad idea

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sarothazrom 8 points 2 months ago

Checkmate, nature.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Anyone claiming this is going to work has no idea how houses are constructed or how hurricanes cause damage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tornados took the roofs off of many houses today across Florida.

[–] UnmetPlayer 10 points 2 months ago

I like to imagine them all getting shifted one house to the left.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

ok so. This isn't going to stop a tree, or a large rock from flying through the side of you wall, but if you home isn't mounted to the foundation (common in old homes) or very well mounted, or just not very wind load capable, this could actually be beneficial.

You could still experience "wall buckling" but since the roof is relatively secured, you're acting from a separate point of leverage. Which is essentially going to be in the middle of the wall, rather than at the top of the wall.

This is all assuming that these anchor points are as strong or stronger than the straps and mounting hardware. And the fact that your home doesn't disintegrate between the staps.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Maybe build with ICF ( insulated concrete forms).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

A bit like the building at the top of Mount Washington

[–] linearchaos 7 points 2 months ago

+10 for holding the roof on the house

+5 for holding the house on the foundation

-7 for creating a large strong web effectively doubling the surface area where flying things can destroy your house.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I love this.

[–] Etterra 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I wonder how deep those stakes are driven lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Wrench 6 points 2 months ago

Someone misunderstood building code for hurricane ties.

[–] marcos 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have that people post those and I don't doubt they are real anymore.

Now I'm just curious about what shape those anchors have, due to morbid curiosity.

[–] HootinNHollerin 6 points 2 months ago

They’re 8 foot deep concrete anchors according to the interview

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're just round and deep. Also, it really does work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] konalt 4 points 2 months ago

moving house

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe they're getting ready to move the earth to another place in space and didn't want their house shifting around.

[–] Sam_Bass 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ive always wondered why nobody does that with their mobile homes. seems like enough strapping would help minimize tornado damage if they were anchored deep enough

[–] DerArzt 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You've gotta remember that most mobile home communities are folks who own their units renting the land for use. This guy has custom concrete anchors, which a mobile home community property owner probably wouldn't want.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›