this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
25 points (87.9% liked)

Videos

14411 readers
651 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Depends on your launch angle. Acceleration due to gravity is constant.

45 degrees is the theoretical ideal launch angle to maximize horizontal distance, but accounting for wind resistance make it closer to 42 degrees. Since you won't be doing it for real, let's say 45 degrees to keep the math easy. In fact, we're ignoring air resistance and friction of all kinds. If you want to get real, use a glider.

At its narrowest point, Marble Canyon, it's about 600 feet across. It could be as much as 18 miles, so let's start small and go from there.

S is speed. Vx is horizontal velocity, Vy is vertical velocity, and t is time in the air. X is the distance across the canyon. Y is only necessary if the two sides have different elevations, but let's ignore that, too.

The time in the air is how long it takes for gravity to make the vertical velocity -Vy.

X = Vxt

0 = Vy + gt/2 so -gt/2 = Vy and t = -2Vy/g

S^2 = Vx^2 + Vy^2 and at 45 degrees, Vx = Vy so S = (√2)Vx

Replace some terms, and we get

X = Vx(-2Vx/g) so X = -2(Vx)^2/g

√(-Xg/2) = Vx and S = (√2)(√-Xg/2)

S = √(-Xg)

So if X is 183 meters at the smallest, and g is -9.8 meters per second squared, then you need a speed of 42.35 m/s at launch, or just shy of 95 mph. You will be in the air for about 4.3 seconds. That's theoretically possible, but remeber you'd be landing while traveling at close to 95 mph at a 45 degree angle towards the ground. The jump is just half the battle.

If you go to the average width, 10 miles or 16,000 meters, requiring a speed of 397 m/s, or 888 mph. At its widest 18 miles, 29,000 meters, you need a speed of 533 m/s or 1,192 mph. At that speed, it's a good thing we're ignoring friction, because air resistance would start to make things toasty.

[–] NegativeInf 10 points 2 months ago

At a certain width we need to start using the rocket equation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] themeatbridge 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, just ADHD. I feel like ChatGPT would have been more correct and also more wrong at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Yes. I too have ADHD and I feel you. Thanks for nerding out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

There is no way

[–] Blaster_M 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

CorridorDigital doing an xkcd whatif

[–] just_another_person 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

About 1200mph. This is just a dumb math equation, or stupid question for a chatbot.

[–] dessimbelackis 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or a fun exercise for a vfx artist

[–] just_another_person -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This person is a VFX artist? I can see why they have resorted to YouTube instead of being hired at their vocation then. Those textures and reflections are straight out of 1995 high school modeling.

[–] dessimbelackis 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You must be fun at parties

[–] just_another_person -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Oh, hey! Thanks for using my own line against me. You must be someone I've lambasted for being absolutely terrible before, but it's SUPER NOICE SEEING YOOOOOU!!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Oh yeah you seem like a treat to be friends with irl

[–] dessimbelackis 0 points 2 months ago

Pretty arrogant of you to assume I’m someone you’ve ever encountered much less lambasted, you just responded to an innocuous comment with a super weird tirade