this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
188 points (87.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35490 readers
534 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just know I saw this, because I would never ever visit freaking groupon. “Sponsored shortcuts” can be disabled in the settings . Bleh :(

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's always been there though, every time I install Firefox I have to disable that and Pocket. Linux, Windows, Mobile, all of them.

[–] HootinNHollerin 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just looked thru settings and customize homepage and don’t see any option to turn them off

Edit: found it, have to go to customize homepage >shortcuts >toggle off sponsored shortcuts

[–] zkfcfbzr 7 points 1 month ago

I dunno about the iOS version, but on the desktop and Android versions both you can also disable them directly from the new tab page itself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Use something Firefox based that has it already disabled.

I use Librewolf on desktop and Mull on mobile.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I mean, I'm not a big fan of it either. On the other hand, I want Firefox to continue to grow and be actively developed and supported. If not from sources like these - to me unobtrusive - ads, where else can their revenue come from?

Not trying to be controversial. Just asking. What business opportunities would we support Mozilla in that we'd be happy with?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

While you're not wrong, it's not the right attitude.

I donate to Mozilla every year. It's not chump change either. It's the largest donation I make to an open source project. They are listed as beneficiaries in my will. When I make my donation this year, I'm going to tell them that they risk my next donation going elsewhere if they keep the path they are on.

The web is quickly becoming enshittified and we, users, have some say in this.

The Linux kernel is self supported without ads and many distros are able to make releases without ads. A browser that is our direct connection to each other and the world should be no different.

Librewolf is probably the best candidate but they rely on Firefox to continue developing. Maybe it's time to focus on Librewolf and try to get it working with Firefox.

[–] Serinus 23 points 1 month ago

There's absolutely no way I'll donate after they announced shutting down mozilla.social in favor of flushing their money down the AI path.

[–] cley_faye 4 points 1 month ago

I will not say that you're not doing the right thing, but I'd suggest reading the financial statements of Mozilla. If you think the way they're steering Firefox is an issue, you may find a few surprises in there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Linux kernel is sponsored by many, many large companies who also contribute heavily to it. It is not lacking funds at all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

There was/is a recent lawsuit against Google for paying other browsers to make google the default search engine, and I think it was ruled against Google. And that payment is like 81% of Mozilla's income. So if they have to stop those payments, Mozilla's is gonna have to find some other ways to make money or cut back massively on their budget. So while I don't like ads, if Mozilla has to do this to stay around, I'll support them. If I got any facts wrong here, someone please correct me.

[–] cley_faye 1 points 1 month ago

The money that goes in (and out) of Mozilla is well documented. At this point it's mostly google. And it mostly pays for administration of the corporation itself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I could care less about Mozilla. Supporting for profit businesses is kind of silly as they will never support you. Buy something that you like but don't have blind brand loyalty. You should serve yourself first.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with the sentiment, but in this case Mozilla is a non-profit.

And before someone jumps in.. Yes, Mozilla Corporation is technically for profit, but it's 100% owned by the non-profit Mozilla Foundation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Clearly they want profit or else they would be running a fund raiser. I personally don't see Mozilla as a nonprofit in reality. Same story with OpenAI

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, it's not just a thing you can call yourselves, there's a legal definition. There's no way to pay money out of a nonprofit into your pocket without committing embezzlement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you work for a nonprofit, you can be paid a salary; if you control a nonprofit, you can pay higher salaries to yourself and/or your friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep. At which point that becomes embezzlement is super vague, but presumably it would be at some point. If you're just a little loose with self compensation as opposed to potentially sinking the organisation, though, it would be hard to prosecute you.

This also goes for the feed-the-starving-kids type nonprofits. I'm aware of examples that spend most of their budget on management and marketing IRL.

IANAL

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

You should serve yourself first

Yep, start by learning that the expression is "I couldn't care less" so you don't come across as an idiot

[–] Bender12 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Groupon? What decade am I in?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Phegan 18 points 1 month ago

TIL Groupon is still a thing

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Is there a Browser where I don't have to turn off these type of sponsored links? I've done it in Chrome, Firefox and Opera at minimum.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Either Fennec or Mull. https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/us.spotco.fennec_dos/

Firefox stripped of its playstore requirements and telementry gives you fennec.

Fennec + arkenfox user.js installed = Mull.

[–] Serinus 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the other hand, it's the absolute least intrusive marketing, you can turn it off permanently, and it supports Mozilla who are one of the main bulwarks defending privacy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Targeted marketing is not privacy friendly ever. Mozilla doesn't need your support. It is up to them to make a profit not you. Don't sacrifice yourself for the sake some some company.

[–] markstos 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Qutebrowser, Dillo, LadyBird, Zen. Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Surprised you didn't mention the commonly mentioned ones, like librewolf, mullvad browser, mull, cromite, fennec

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Non of those are privacy focused. Ladybird isn't even finished yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes

For mobile or Desktop?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Every time I say “Safari”, I get death threats.

[–] HootinNHollerin 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

go to customize homepage >shortcuts >toggle off sponsored shortcuts

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RunningInRVA 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You need to charge your phone

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Living on the edge haha

[–] 9point6 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Google blocks ublock on chrome just as Firefox adds first party ads

Fan-fucking-tastic

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Wym "just as", those sponsored links for Firefox have been around for a while, haven't they? I definitely remember turning that setting off a while ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Its been there forever. And you can disable it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Use Librewolf

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can't you disable it in settings? On android there is an option to toggle off sponsored shortcuts.
I agree they shouldn't force it on but at least with minimal effort and if it's really annoying it's easy to disable.

[–] cley_faye 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, you can. The same way you can disable a lot of annoying things in other programs. Still an annoyance at the expense of users, and a gateway to more passive users to click on something unexpected.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The android version has had this for a while.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Use something else like Fennec or Mull. Also you can configure Firefox with user.js

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Wait, you mean you don't have it set to go to a blank tab every time you open a new tab? /s

[–] ObsidianZed 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

On Mobile devices, I simply don't use the homepage. I always disable it and use a blank page.

On desktop, I use a homepage/new tab replacer.

load more comments
view more: next ›