Her secret weapon is addressing that generations top concerns?
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
53 points (83.5% liked)
politics
19237 readers
3179 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To be fair, it's been ignored for so long it might as well be a secret weapon.
it's been ignored for so long
Laughing in Gen X
If you don't laugh, you'll cry :)
Just drown my sorrows in the garden hose until I can come back inside.
I don't like how correct you are.
Reading the first paragraph gives the answer. But, if you don't want to do that, it's affordable housing.
Guessed by the thumbnail. Was not steered wrong.
I love Vance’s stupid argument that undocumented people are taking your homes.
The population growth rate is declining in the US and will be plateauing. Also, Vance wants people to have way more kids and accelerate the population growth rate.
I swear, these weirdos play mad libs and just out “illegal immigrants” into every blank space.
It's an absolutely dumb idea, though. It won't solve a single thing.
The real fix would upset the rich. No person, entity, or affiliated entity should be allowed to own more than like 5 homes.
That's literally all it would take to solve the issue. 60% all all rental houses are owned by corpos. Some own over 50,000 houses they collect rent on. That's just absolute bullshit that shouldn't exist. Owning houses shouldn't be a 7+ figure income strategy
There’s a simpler solution: no non-individual entity can own a residential property - house, condo, apartment, whatever. The exception, of course, being banks, in the interest of mortgages, but that’s rather different anyways - the bank is essentially holding ownership of the property in escrow until the loan is paid back. That one rule would go SO FAR in controlling the price of housing. Yes, scarcity is part of the issue, but blatant corporate profiteering and forever-renting is an insidious and horrifying threat that fucking NOBODY who makes policy talks about, because if they did the lobbyists would bury them.
Worded like that, an individual can own 1,000 houses.
There would of course be ramping taxes for owning multiple residences, up to 100% once you get past a vacation home or two, but you must know that that’s nowhere even close to being the primary driver of the housing crisis.
If course companies and people owning multiple homes is the driving factor. That's the only reason it isn't a buyers market and housing costs have literally over doubled in the past 15 years. Everything has been bought up to be used as rentals or air BNB's.
And Trump has his secret weapon: lying out of his ass with no fact checking. Guess which one will win.
And my parents believe all his bullshit and cast doubt on anything that contradicts them.
Crack.
In short, more housing must be built.
Deflating housing prices when boomers are trying to retire is a good way to lose 2028 though...
F BOOMERS! They've taken enough already
Honestly, fuck 'em... They're rapidly declining as a voting block and if they sold the houses they bought in the 80s at 2008 prices they'd still make a fucking killing.
In general, the boomers with houses are also the boomers with pensions.
And we can't afford their houses right now anyway.
Is it 5G and mRNA vaccines?
Or is it Jewish space lasers?