this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
66 points (92.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35731 readers
911 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Why doesn't Mexico simply arrest Trump?"

[–] Don_Dickle 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not going to lie that put a big smile on my face just thinking about it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

As much as it would be a horrible clusterfuck.... God it's the dream, isn't it?

[–] Carrolade 62 points 2 months ago

There are a lot of economic ties between Mongolia and Russia. You don't get a lot of options when you're landlocked and sandwiched between two large powers. So, Putin has a fair amount of leverage there, more than in most places.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

Some potatoes are simply too hot.

[–] paddirn 27 points 2 months ago

Their army size and military spending is a fraction of Russia’s, plus economic ties and nukes existing. Although now would be probably one of the best times to go against Russia militarily, since they’re stretched pretty thin at the moment, I doubt Mongolia would be the one to do it.

[–] DrownedRats 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Because the potential cost to them doesn't out weigh the benefits (or potential costs) they get from adhering to the ICC regulations.

[–] Badeendje 12 points 2 months ago

Yes, in terms of military strength they would just be a rounding error. Even the Russian army could take on mongolia. Less than 200k military (35k active, the rest reserve) and a budget around 200 million.

Mongolia is huuuuuuge with only 3.5 million people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And then what?

Mongolia is fully landlocked and is a minor military power.

  • They cannot get him out of the country to the ICC as neither Russia nor China would give them flight permissions. Russia for obvious reasons and China would surely not do it as well - as it would make travelling for Xi much more problematic, especially after what he plans with Taiwan.

  • They cannot keep him there because the Russians, as military incapable as they are, would basically drive into UB and simply retrieve him. The Mongolian armed forces have a joint budget that is less than what a single CH-53K King Stallion costs. Their army is based on (hardly working) T54 and BMP1. Their airforce owns exactly two Mig29 Fighters (gift of Russia). And that does not even include the very real possibility that the Chinese do Vladimir a favour and get him - simply to make sure to keep the West occupied and shift the focus away from them and Taiwan again.

  • If they keep him there and he dies...well....that would at least mean the end of the political ruling class of the country and could lead to the very real threat of large scale revenge by either Russia or Russia and China.

My personal prophecy for any scenario like that would be that a few thousand Mongolians die, around 300.000 end up in labour camps and Mongolia as a sovereign nation ceases to exist. Why? Mongolia exists mainly because two major powers "couldn't be bothered" to conquer them, it would make them look bad and a buffer to a not that welcome neighbour is always welcome. If Mongolia fucks it up for one or both of them it basically looses that "reason" to exist in the eyes of both the Russians and the Chinese. And they would be "bad enough" in the light of a lot of countries as well as their own population that a "swift special military operation" is justified.

[–] Don_Dickle 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You sound like either you have studied this or are in the armed forces...no offense or anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Neither of it - but part of my work is indeed similar to an analyst, for a different topic, though. Thanks, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

because they do need him / fear him more than we do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Arresting another country's head of state is about as clear a declaration of war as you can give.
So your question boils down to: "Why doesn't Mongolia go to war against Russia?"

[–] Treczoks 2 points 2 months ago

I hope that all the signee states of the ICC treaty will call in their Mongolian Ambassador and make it clear in no uncertain terms that this might lead to other agreements and contracts with Mongolia might be at stake.