this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
240 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dlayknee 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What is their cited reasoning for bailing? A unified effort to prevent voter fraud sounds great - why in the world would any of the states want out of it? Makes you wonder about how serious those states are about eliminating fraud in the first place...

[–] TwoGems 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

On top of this, ERIC helps states to remove voters who have moved and send voter registration information to those who have moved into their jurisdiction. Republicans don't want more people being enrolled to vote. The more people vote, the more they lose.

[–] hglman 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost as if all things Republican politicians say are performance. Like their real goal is naked power at what ever cost. That they will exploit every possible path, I would say that if they though they could do it by being not racist, they would. They have absolutely no principle other than self-enrichment.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if, and this is a big if, but what if they ran on policies most people actually wanted?

I know it sounds crazy, but they could actually maintain power by just giving voters what they ask for instead of doing everything possible to serve corporate and religious institutions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I have been saying this for years. The two party system is only a failure when one of the parties decides to stop serving the people. But they are so hung up on outdated ideology and corporate interests that they don’t care to lose the vote of their constituents. So I have to always vote for the other party since it’s the only party that will serve me. My vote literally becomes a vote to continue existing, because the other party would prefer I didn’t. No democracy there.

[–] esadatari 6 points 1 year ago

you see, according to texas politics, it’s only fraud if they lose, if they win it’s just fine, no voter fraud here boss.

speaking as a left leaning texan

[–] Transcendant 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I know the most obvious response is that they're doing this because they want to commit voter fraud, but I read a really ~~inciteful~~ insightful comment the other day about how republicans think, that I feel applies here.

They cannot handle being told what to do. Even if it's for obvious public good. Even if it is for THEIR benefit. If they feel they've been 'told' to do it, they will not do it. It's quite pathetic and infantile.

[–] Eldritch 17 points 1 year ago

You will never meet more childish adults than conservatives. So that statement checks out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insightful* but yeah

Inciteful means it makes you angry

[–] Transcendant 1 points 1 year ago

You're right, d'oh. Thanks for the correction

[–] whereisk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fox News tells them what to think all the time - "oh that's just Republicans being reactionaries" is not very credible.

[–] RGB3x3 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps it's best to clarify that Republicans don't like being told what to do by anyone other than Republicans. And even then, it's their select "idols." That they're okay with. Because they'll turn on a republican that tells them to do something in their best interest if it goes against their "beliefs."

It's ideology over facts, always.

[–] paddirn 31 points 1 year ago

They probably only joined it just to learn how to circumvent whatever methods were going to be used to prevent voter fraud.

[–] Desistance 25 points 1 year ago

They want to commit voter fraud.

[–] Sanctus 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't their state color the ones that are the loudest about Fraud? I swear I got a hard on when Lake got slapped as frivolous with her case lmfao.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just remember its largest not the first. 9 states have left and they all have something in common.

[–] reddig33 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Texas needs to be split into multiple states. At least half of Texans don’t agree with the nonsense the rural voters have been putting in play.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Texas into three, California into four, Florida into two. Merge the midwest together into Delmarva to bring us back down to fifty.

[–] reddig33 2 points 1 year ago

Texas as five states would probably work best,: east/west/north/south/central. Each of these regions has its own culture and major metropolitan areas/capitals:

Tyler/Longview El Paso Dallas/Fort Worth Houston Austin/San Antonio