this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
403 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38971 readers
2772 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Volodymyr Zelensky on Aug. 31 called on the U.S., the U.K., France, and Germany to allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons to strike targets in Russia.

“I appeal to the U.S., the U.K., France and Germany. We need the ability to genuinely and fully defend Ukraine and Ukrainians. We require both: permissions for long-range capabilities and your long-range shells and missiles,” Zelensky said in his evening address.

. . .

Kyiv has long argued that restrictions on the use of long-range weapons are stifling its war effort, while Washington claimed that allowing Ukraine to hit deep into Russian territory with its weapons could escalate the conflict.

MBFC
Archive

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennybird 98 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I saw more than I should've with the recent Kharkiv bombings by Russia.

Ukraine should absolutely be able to strike as far as they desire into Russia.

After all, it's not escalation; it's parity.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It wouldn't even be parity. That would require mass targeting of civilians, which I doubt Ukraine will do even if they were allowed and able to strike deep into Russia, as well as using chemical weapons and all kinds of other things.

[–] cheese_greater 75 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The West encourages the West to do so as well

—Me, of the West

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, if Ukraine falls guess who is next. It is in our all interest to let them do it.

We have to acknowledge that those people are dying for our safety too.

[–] cheese_greater 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Russia needs to get fucked in a way its current state is completely fractured and it has to make an entirely clean break with its past. It can be done, it seems the political will need only precipitate which can only occur as the Fuck you, got mine folks are increasingly affected. Narcissistic people and methods need to be quarantined so their deathblood can be expressed and any final matters ensured carriage

[–] Valmond 4 points 2 months ago

Denucléarisation and probably splitting up russia in some 5 regions.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 56 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I'm at a point where I'm starting to think USA doesn't want Ukraine to "win" the war, just "fight the war indefinately". They don't want either side to lose, but they want Ukraine to look on top.

[–] lepinkainen 30 points 2 months ago

This is a perfect way to weaken Russia for a looong time both militarily and economically.

China will be the next one to do something stupid and a weak Russia is a good thing when it happens

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've thought that since Russia first invaded. Really feels like the US is just trying to bleed Russia for as long as possible.

[–] slaacaa 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, they are “boiling the frog”. The strategic goal of the US is not Ukraine winning, it’s Russia losing. By grinding up Russian resources month after month, the US can maximize the long-term damage to Russia by destroying their resources (e.g. money, military equipment, soldiers/workforce).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

That's not it, that's what Russia is trying to pitch to discourage Ukrainians.

The actual answer is less evil and more sad:

We weren't prepared and when the war started we didn't think Ukraine would fight, we figured they would lose in a month or 2.

When your whole geopolitical assessment is blown out of the water, you tend to move forward cautiously, because at the level they operate, cautious is always considered the right move with so much at stake.

Plus, domestic politics means committing makes it a political issue, and as a political issue, the dems could lose the election on this alone. If the Russians actually understood us they could use this in ways you couldn't imagine, but fortunately their tools are still crude.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US wants Ukraine to drain Russian resources and fight to the last Ukrainian....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Da comrade, ignore the Russian threats of war, this is clearly just the west holding back.

Literally half the shipments were stopped by the Russia wing of the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Biden is afraid of what it will mean if Russia loses the war. His mindset is quite ossified on a number of topics, and this is one of the biggest ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I'm all for giving Ukraine everything it needs to teach Russia a lesson that they can't forget.

But while I disagree with it, I still understand their fear of a humiliated Russia, they're erratic at the best of times.

Still, they broke the peace of Europe, the price they have to pay for that is blood, and it is very high.

[–] riodoro1 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only protecting Ukraine meant killing brown people. Then the US would be the first country to help.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 3 points 2 months ago

Which brown people? You Americans pick and choose which brown people are worthy and which are bombable depending on what cable news told you.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 19 points 2 months ago

I heard someone saying this would start a full scale war, as if the Ukrainians haven't already been at war and under invasion. Hitting the invading country inside its own borders is an old and well used strategy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm down. Let them use everything they can until Russia either gets the fuck out of Ukraine or becomes New Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Well, everything within the Geneva conventions. Unlike Russia.

[–] aeronmelon 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is easier to ask forgiveness than to ask permission. :)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which is great for wearing your boyfriend's hoodies, but is slightly more problematic when dealing with geopolitical scales and, you know, countries giving you weapons that you absolutely need to not be steamrolled by an invading force.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

And they're only a few thousand votes away from losing that support as-is.