this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
145 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19073 readers
5125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Throwing more fuel on the fire, are we, Donald? This won't look good for you in court.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What court? Nothing ever happens, he has been pulling these stunts for so many years now. Consequences are almost nil

[–] rambaroo 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The man was literally arrested and appeared in court already.

This is nothing but more stochastic terrorism. Most of his supporters are too comfortable and too cowardly to do shit. But we do need to worry about the incel loser types who love to commit terrorist attacks.

[–] overzeetop 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The man was literally arrested and appeared in court already.

Multiple times. And yet he walks free, passport in hand, foreign governments lavishing money on his closer family members (who are also his business partners), supporters lavishing money on him to aid his ~~lifestyle~~ ~~defense fund~~ campaign.

[–] dhork 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And yet he walks free, passport in hand

That part I'll argue, he deserves special treatment here only because he is one of a handful of people in the country with round-the-clock Secret Service protection. The court doesn't need his passport, because the Secret Service can make sure he is available for his hearings. At this point, they are as much there for his handling as his protection.

He knows it, but also knows that if he ever declines their protection or dismisses them those judges will not be so lenient on him. It wouldn't surprise me if there's been an under-the-table deal where the court doesn't have to take his passport, because the Secret Service has actual possession of it, with no need to publicize it. In fact, has there been any evidence at all that Trump has traveled outside the country since the indictments?

[–] Nightwingdragon 12 points 1 year ago

The man was literally arrested and appeared in court already.

He was also literally allowed to walk free on his own recognizance on charges that anyone else would have been held without bail for.

He was also literally allowed to surrender himself voluntarily, and did not have to go through being handcuffed, perp-walked, or have his mugshot taken.

He was also literally allowed to keep his passport and has no travel restrictions even though his all-but-unlimited resources and private planes make him the textbook definition of a flight risk.

He is also literally being coddled by his hand-picked judge in one of the cases, who has repeatedly ruled in his favor multiple times already and said he deserves special treatment because of who he is.

He is also literally continuing to engage in the exact behavior that got him in legal trouble in the first place, and openly daring people to do something about it.

The fact that he was arrested means jack shit. He has never suffered actual consequences a day in his life beyond a few fines that wouldn't even amount to a rounding error on his tax forms. Even in the cases he's facing, many believe that even if he is found guilty, the chances of him seeing jail time are low because of the logistics involved with jailing a former president. At worst, he'll be sentenced to house arrest where after the first 27 or so times he violates the terms of his house arrest, they might hold a hearing to politely ask him not to do it again or next time they'll have to say "or else".

[–] Decoy321 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are we even dignifying this by sharing it? He doesn't deserve the attention.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s what everyone said last time, then people died. “Ignore it and it’ll go away” doesn’t work when literally millions of people still listen to this man.

[–] Decoy321 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying ignore the man." I agree in that being actively dangerous. I''m saying we shouldn't help him keep engagement by sharing every stupid fucking thing he says. It's a deliberate way they help keep narratives shifted in their favor.

We should pay attention to the news ABOUT him, not the news FROM him.

[–] BitingChaos 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Selmafudd 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's been done so we can count that out

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 1 year ago

So... ear stuff?

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one's given me a million dollars. You're free to do that to me, Don.

[–] TwoGems 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Thetomman 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My mom is one of those people. She keeps telling me to rack up a ton of debt because she thinks it'll all just get forgiven

[–] TwoGems 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Deadeyegai 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh? So is it Jan 6 part 2? Oh man I Did Not See That Coming!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Oh? So is it Jan 6 part 2? Oh man I Did Nazi That Coming!

Ftfy

[–] dhork 7 points 1 year ago

It's worse than that. The audio from this came from an interview with Rush Limbaugh right before the 2020 election. The original context of it can be seen as leading up to Jan 6. The fact that it is resurfacing (with Trump's approval) means there is more coming.

[–] MossBear 15 points 1 year ago

It'll never not be alarming that this is where we're at. From Dan Quayle misspelling potato being disqualifying to this...

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 14 points 1 year ago

Do you think that's how he talks to the children he fucked?

[–] Revezd 11 points 1 year ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Calm down, criminal

[–] EdibleFriend 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ive never seen Emma Watsons butthole.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Ask and ye shall receive...

spoilerhttps://imgur.io/j6W0q2R (NSFW)

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 4 points 1 year ago
[–] ampedwolfman 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn where did you find that? I've been looking for this for ages.

[–] Nightwingdragon 1 points 1 year ago

The same place it always was.....right between Emma Watson's butt cheeks.....

[–] TokenBoomer 0 points 1 year ago

That’s Archie Manning’s kid.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 1 points 1 year ago

Trump was so vague for all we know that is what he meant.

[–] TokenBoomer 1 points 1 year ago

Why do his farts sound like the horns from War of the Worlds?