this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
136 points (95.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8233 readers
906 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy room link: [email protected]

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Multiplayer MOBA game. I feel like this is an important distinction for most of us.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Oh that's a shame. Back to waiting for Half-Life 3 then.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

FPS MOBA, which makes a bit more unique over the typical overhead view.

Having played it, I got no clue what Im doing, having not played MOBAs before. Enemies are bullet sponges too.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Third person shooter. It's not an FPS.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

Fthird person shooter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah sorry, forgot it was third person.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

Close enough.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think anybody says TPS as an acronym though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No. They say shooter, or cover shooter, or type out 3rd person shooter.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling third person shooters FPSes is like calling rogue lites rogue likes. I don't really care even if it is technically slightly inaccurate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Good for you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Have you ever heard of Smite?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds burning, but I guess it’s because I’m not a moba person.

[–] kn33 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not really a MOBA person either but I'm really getting into it. Idk, something about the Overwatch type vibes really drags me in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember Battleborn? FPS MOBA from Gearbox that came out in like... 2018 or thereabouts. Never got off the ground and got completely shuttered in like, a year, iirc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never bothered playing that. Didn't even sound enticing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yep. I was in the primary market for it back then, and even I was like, meh.

[–] kn33 1 points 3 weeks ago

Enemies are bullet sponges too.

That's kind of intentional and part of the design of MOBAs.

In the early game, this makes it difficult to get kills unless the enemy makes a mistake. You want players to have to choose between spending their time harassing their opposing player or farming minions.

Later on, the bullet sponge effect makes for longer, more interesting fights. That can end up, being not the case, though, if the economy is too one-sided. That's another reason for the bullet sponge design - to make the economy more important. That's how many souls you collect. Buying more means you're stronger with items and the fights are more in your favor.

So, essentially, the bullet sponge amplifies the more interesting/complex elements of the game. They wouldn't really be possible if you could just one-hit your opponent from base level.

[–] halcyoncmdr 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yup, don't care about it. Not my type of game. Also a genre with too many games as it is for the genre to really support, IMO.

It will have to be nearly perfect to pull people from other similar games. It needs to fix the issues the others have, at launch, or it will be dead on arrival.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Eh, there was definitely a couple years where the market was flooded, but at this point there really aren't any notable games in the genre other than League, Dota, and Smite. Deadlock being a third person game puts it in direct competition with Smite, though it's also got more shooter DNA, which is aiming to bring in the overwatch ~~crowd~~ refugees. And at least IMO it already feels better than Smite, or any of the other abortive attempts at a third person moba over the years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

I really hope they add some ctf and koh modes in the future. I think it would add some fun variety to the game.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Been really enjoying this, much more than I ever liked Smite. They have a ton of great ability and item designs from Dota to draw on, but it's significantly more approachable. I really like how the last hitting and denying works. The balance is still getting dialed in but I'm having a good time while it does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The absence of last hitting and denying is why I loved Heroes of the Storm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I really like how deadlock does it; you just have to hit the creep with player damage in the last few seconds of its life, and then your whole lane gets the reward, which can't be denied. But it also generates a little orb that can be secured by either team; if no one pops it, it automatically goes to the killing team. It has the HOTS thing where farm gets shared pretty much evenly among everyone in the lane, but there's still enough gameplay to the creep killing that it's engaging, instead of just standing in lane passively and getting XP for it.

[–] AtomicTacoSauce 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was excited until I saw multiplayer MOBA. Hard pass.

[–] NewNewAccount 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Third person though. Maybe that makes a difference.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WereCat 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] tehmics 6 points 3 weeks ago

No, it's top down. Isometric specifically refers to a parallel projection

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My friend sent me an invite last week. I dont know, it wasnt for me. Maybe a little later down the line?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah my excitement died immediately.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Any chance you’d be willing to send me an invite?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

If play or want to play, check out: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I had 0 luck running it on Linux so far :(

[–] bblkargonaut 2 points 3 weeks ago

Game has potential, kinda plays like onslaught from unreal mixed heavily with overwatch and dota. But in the current state it's not great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I have played it. For me, to many options (but that's the MOBA part). I would like to see a game mode without all those options and just be hero shooter.

[–] Defaced 1 points 3 weeks ago

The big problem I've seen with it so far is that bots on your own team won't push the objectives and there's no easy way to direct them. I had a match that lasted almost an hour with no end in sight because both sides of bots were pushing then retreating constantly. It was just a giant tug of war. Now I'm sure it's much different in real matches, but I prefer warming up with bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Why not make halflife 3 and update tf2

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I wish it has more element like CnC Renegade or Battlefield. This is quite an interesting game experiment