this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
868 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19073 readers
5069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has been accused of violating federal law by allegedly calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss the ceasefire deal the U.S. is helping negotiate between Israel and Hamas.

The former president allegedly made the call on August 14, according to Axios, which cited two unnamed "U.S. sources who were briefed on the call."

If Trump did make the call, he would potentially be breaking the law as the Logan Act, enacted in 1799, prohibits unauthorized private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the U.S.

American Muckrakers, an organization that states it seeks to hold politicians and officials accountable, has filed a request with the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State.

(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre 8 points 2 months ago

perfect call, it was perfect... everybody says so. it's actually way, way better than perfect, way higher than 100 percent perfection...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mr. Netanyahu sir, if your support gets a Republican majority in the 2 houses and me back into the Presidency I promise we will give you so much bombs. The best bombs. Bigly. Nobody would get as many bombs as you.

[–] Waldowal 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You could just as easily hear him say:

Netanyahu, or should I say, Netanboohoo. Used to be a great guy. Loved his country. Talked to him alot. Great guy. Not anymore. Total loser. "Criminal guy Netanyahu" they call him now. Everybody calls him that. Criminal...guy...Netanyahu. Nut N' Honey. Great cereal from the 80s. Best commercials. Lot of commercials. Very funny commercials. Not anymore. You don't see Nut N' Honey anymore. Wonder why? Is Netanbabu involved? I don't know. He's ruining suburbia though.

No idea why anyone would pledge loyalty to him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

– It was a perfect call! *gestures with hands weirdly*

[–] saltesc 5 points 2 months ago

Good

This means hell run the whole, "Only I had the balls to blah blah blah"

And if the democrats want to continue their strong run, they'll have to be on top of action toward it as well. He's a useful idiot sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Dude sure does love his "perfect" phone calls

[–] chakan2 4 points 2 months ago

Lol...no was was that call to accept the ceasefire deal. It was...wait until after the election, then take the deal.

[–] someguy3 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The former president allegedly made the call on August 14, according to Axios, which cited two unnamed "U.S. sources who were briefed on the call."

The next day, however, Netanyahu's office denied that the call took place.

[–] FatherGascown 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe next time they will actually hit him.

[–] uebquauntbez 1 points 2 months ago

This is his entry fee to the white house ... in Saint Petersburg in Russia.

[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 2 months ago

Great? It's not like Democrats are interested in putting him in jail. They have a living, breathing bogeyman to threaten people with so they can dismiss scrutiny for damned near anything with a "Do you want trump again?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

i thought we all collectively realized that reporting on trump actions reported by "unnamed sources" doesn't do anything to harm his campaign?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›