this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
84 points (90.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viking_Hippie 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

While local governments are not forced to comply, Newsom said in a press conference on Thursday that he will withhold funding from cities and counties for not clearing encampments next year.

Fucking Eric Adams with a $1000 haircut 🤬

[–] TheStar 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope, he provided them a ton of funding to fix the problem … and they didn’t. Kind of their fault

[–] Viking_Hippie 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If by "fix the problem" you mean punish unhoused people for existing and/or just get them out of sight without doing anything about the underlying problems causing homelessness.

Chief amongst them the sky high housing costs no doubt caused by the profiteering of some of Newsom's billionaire donors and former colleagues in the real estate industry.

[–] TheStar -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope I do not mean that. $24 billion in funding plus 4 billion in grants to local governments. All of this before they decided to start removing homeless people from the streets. Don’t tell them they haven’t tried to fix the root cause, they have, they just couldn’t manage to do it, and honestly I can’t blame them, rehabilitating homeless people is a tough job that money can’t do.

[–] Viking_Hippie 1 points 3 months ago

Don’t tell them they haven’t tried to fix the root cause, they have

Do you have a source of every local government in California trying to implement regulations that only the state and federal governments are empowered to enact? Other than your ass, I mean.

rehabilitating homeless people is a tough job that money can’t do.

Oh. You're one of those victim blaming "homelessness is because of drugs and mental illness" bigots. How disappointing.

[–] Cornpop 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Something needs to be done though. This a start but only half of a solution. The homeless do need to be taken off the streets and the massive roadside camps need to be demolished. It’s a legit health and safety hazard. Maybe make dedicated areas a little more off the beaten path and provide power and water and sewer services for them to set up in a more appropriate area in the woods.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe the problem should not be swept under the rug, and the root causes, meaning the housing market, the economy and mental health should be treated.

Note that many other places don't have a problem of homeless encampments this big. Wonder why.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it partially the weather and partially because a bunch of other states ship their homeless there?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

And mostly because of the cost of housing.

[–] TheStar 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And how would we do that? In places like SF we’ve spent billions trying to fix the problem … and nothing has been fixed. There are many options for help but the people on the streets choose not to seek for help, they made the decision to stay on the streets and this is the consequence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it's their fault, not the nonexistent public (mental) healthcare, not the insane inflation and housing prices, not any of that.

Maybe those billions should have been spent differently. How many houses did you build out of those billions for example?

[–] qwertilliopasd 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This a start but only half of a solution

It's the second, worse half. Set up those services first. Destroying what little these people can scrape together only serves to push them further down.

[–] HootinNHollerin 6 points 3 months ago

We also need to address other states sending their homeless here

[–] feedum_sneedson 4 points 3 months ago