this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
349 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18887 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest 107 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be better if they could forget the hate that he convinced them of having.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, my sweet summer child.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can go bless your own heart using southern insults.

I'm an old European man, but I have not conceded the belief that we can make the world a better place using positive reinforcement or just by fucking trying.

I beg of you not to give in to apathy for lulz. It's not funny.

If the democrats win, you will need to embrace your fellow countrymen and get them on your team. Alienating them like the meme suggests is only going to reinforce their wrong beliefs.

Okay, that's my pep-talk. A more affable way of putting it: Yo, you gotta live those people, make the best of it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I should have been clearer.

... the hate that he convinced them of having.

They already had that hate, all primed and ready to vote for the person who would authorize them to use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fair point.

I actually had the same thought before posting, but decided that it was more relevant to describe my point of view on the solution rather than the problem.

The conservative hatred is still your problem to solve, because Trump is sure as fuck not taking the issue along into the grave when he dies.

In my opinion it's best solved by getting in dialogue with the idiots and allowing them to change their minds instead of holding a grudge against them and excluding them. I acknowledge that it is naïve but I want to believe that anyone can be become smarter, even republican voters. Excluding them won't work, because they already feel left out of what they call the "elite", which is really their term for anyone who didn't flunk out of school.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to believe that anyone can be become smarter, even republican voters.

Don't get me wrong. I firmly believe that there has to be a path to redemption. That path exists. All anyone who is missing the point has to do is think about literally anyone besides themselves. I can't make anyone do that. That is not, and cannot, be my problem to solve.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one can ever make anyone do or learn anything. That's the teachers curse. Understanding only comes when a person themselves understands it themselves.

The best you can do is to keep questioning them until they at least think about it, and that's all I ask you to consider doing.

Someone tells racist shit? Ask them why?
Your uncle doesn't want universal healthcare? Ask him why?
You mother doesn't want student loans forgiven? Ask her why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because it'll make them think about it, and them thinking is what is needed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in having, for example, a racist defend their racism to me. Nor am I interested in giving them the opportunity to firm up their own wrong-headed conceptions through the action of defending them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is the point. Nobody can defend racism. Do not sit in silent agreement, question it instead.

You will hear a lot of garbage, but you don't have to agree, just listen and ask.

They'll come back with all kinds of excuses or argumens.. "I feel like.." , "I've heard that everyone says" or point to sources of statementd etc..

You can question all of it, until they start questioning themselves why they're listening to those sources in the first place. Again, don't push it, just let them come back with whatever argument they've found and then question it. If you do it in a civil way, they'll eventually start thinking or asking for your opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I refer you to my previous comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Answering the last part of your previous comment:

They will only firm up their own opinion if you start arguing.

As soon as you say "you're wrong because ABC and D argument", *that's when they dig into their opinion and make up reasoning to protect their view.

Questioning doesn't do that. It's a fine way to allow people to reason themselves out of the hole the dug into.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you will need to embrace your fellow countrymen and get them on your team

That assumes they want us to embrace them or be on our team. It's pretty clear they don't.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ahh. Give it try. Whenever they say something,njust ask them why they think that. Don't argue, don't push, just ask. Eventually they'll think about it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Someone else will have to do that. I don't have enough patience, and I'm sure their idiocy will give me a migraine.

Maybe, maybe if they come to me asking to find common ground I'd listen. But I'm not wasting what little time I have on this planet throwing pearls before swine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

🙏

This right here. Life is too short to fuck around with fascists and nazis. 24 hours isn't enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Nah. I'm old and tired and don't care if those chuckle fucks hate me. I'll just pretend that their whole little pathetic world doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

nah id rather not embrace awful bigots they can fix their own fucking hearts.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Impeached felon. Rapist. Taitor. Thief. Liar. Embarrassment. And yet you think he's president

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] _bcron 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would be not at all surprised if the supreme court inadvertently abolished slander and libel by overturning this decision

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They'd have to do some really meticulous double-speak because rich legal "geniuses" like Trump and Musk use slander and libel in the courtroom to silence people like Paula Dean uses butter and the N-word in the kitchen

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he doesnt know whats in the constitution, nor does he care.

[–] Snapz 6 points 1 month ago

Weird, old felon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Anyone else hope he loses his shit and erupts into a gag order breaking tirade?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 1 month ago

The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/despite-donald-trumps-claims-his-gag-order-holds-up-against-the-constitution-233762
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support