this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
455 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1894 readers
968 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uberdroog 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They already gave out all the tax cuts they could manage, and surprise, surprise, there are none left for anyone who would truly benefit. Just wait. Things are gonna trickle down any day now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There are more tax cuts left for people who could benefit. They're just all also going to go to the 1%

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Get JD Vance on the phone! He keeps saying people with children are more special. /s

[–] btaf45 14 points 3 months ago

Turns out when we follow the money that billionaires are the actual people the GOP regards as special.

[–] Snapz 9 points 3 months ago

Phone is lost in the couch cushions... I am NOT putting my hand in there.

[–] someguy3 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

The legislation would have given low-income parents larger tax refunds, especially in households with multiple children. Tax analysts said a tax filer who has two children and earned $9,000 last year would receive a child tax credit refund worth $975 under current law, but $1,950 under the proposal.

The bill’s authors, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), said it would “help 16 million kids from low-income families and lift 500,000 out of poverty,” in part by allowing parents to claim the full tax credit for each of their kids, something they can’t do now.

...

Republicans complained that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) only brought the measure up for a vote six months after it was approved by the House (by a 357-70 vote) to help bolster the campaigns of vulnerable Democratic incumbents facing tough reelection fights in November.

Some GOP senators also warned about giving Democrats a major election-year legislative victory

[–] edgemaster72 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

After denying Obama the chance to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat then rushing through ACB in a much shorter window, Republicans deserve all the election year fuckery until Trump's appointees are off the court

[–] someguy3 20 points 3 months ago

Mr Lindsay Graham "use my words against me" when denying Obama's pick. Well he's not a man of his word.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some GOP senators also warned about giving Democrats a major election-year legislative victory

They'd rather burn the country down for wins than do anything useful for regular people.

[–] someguy3 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They wouldn't pass this if they had the white house. As far as I'm concerned, they think burning the country down is a win.

[–] Rakonat 5 points 3 months ago

Keeping the working and middle class entirely dependent on billionaires is what pays for their campaigns to get elected. Killing education and any critical thinking ability in their base is what makes the scam work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Senator McConnell had the following to say:

[–] Snapz 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Valmond 5 points 3 months ago

Seems young and healthy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't tell if he is stroking out?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, but that's certainly the face I make when I'm stroking one out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you look like Mitch maybe you should talk to your doctor about it, and either get some medicine or embalming fluid 😁

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

That's a bit mean. There are plenty of old people and ugly babies who look like Mitch.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge 17 points 3 months ago

Yes because Republicans want people to suffer as much as legally possible.

[–] WraithGear 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

1, they never ever have the intention to do so. 2, even if they did, it would not be during an election cycle when the current president is a Democrat

[–] Agrivar 6 points 3 months ago

2a. and if they did, it would have a built in expiration timed for the middle of the next term.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Republicans are QUICK to cut Taxes for Billionaires and QUICK to Increase Taxes for the Working Class because they CARE about you and me! We just need to VOTE them into Power before they Show us!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)