this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
233 points (95.7% liked)

politics

20359 readers
5119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Trump campaign spokesperson called the claims "completely fabricated."

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chainweasel 64 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Used a racial slur a decade ago?
I'd bet my life savings that he used a racial slur this morning if it weren't for the fact there's no way his fat ass is up at 7:30 a.m. on a Tuesday.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah…… for the people that will vote for Trump “used a slur in the 90s” isn’t the grand reveal they think it is.

[–] fluxion 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Telling his nephew he should let his developmentally disabled son die... classic Trump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry to tell you this friend... A decade ago was 2014

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Older people tend to wake up earlier, and he is really fucking old. Isn't it weird his old ass is running for president?

[–] dogsnest 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I understand he's the oldest presidential nominee, EVER!
There should be age limits! 70 or 75 at the oldest!

Ridiculous that a guy that old can be president! Bill Clinton was president 25 years ago, and is still younger!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

While I do think there are people who could be great presidents into their 80s mentally, the stresses of the job and how rapidly things change does lend itself to a need for an age cap.

No more than 70 as of the day they would take office sounds good to me as they would leave before their 75th birthday plus it is double the minimum of 35 do it would be easy to remember!

The same could be apllied to the chain of succession. If over 70 on the day they would be swirn in it passes to the next person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need to get back to the idea of people retiring. no one should be able to run for or be appointed office if over age 60 and if their term would go beyond 65 then the term is shortened to the year of the their 65th an election is held for the office (or new appointment)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even though I think 60 is a good age for people to be able to retire, I also think that 60 is low for forced retirement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Im not saying they have to retire from any kind of work. Just can't run for a new term of office.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Waking up early is like the one thing he does. His bowels get him up at 4:30 and he diarrheas hamberders down the toilet while rage tweeting for like 2 hours. I bet some of his calls to the early morning fox couch show were done from the porcelain throne.

[–] NineMileTower 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's only a matter of time before his dementia and anger make him say one at a rally.

[–] Unlocalhost 15 points 6 months ago

He probably still uses them

Now don't forget this one thing, VOTE!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The really shitty thing is that it wasn't that many decades ago that it was considered completely normal to say the N-word. Apparently, when my mom and her friends were children, they used to only know the older racist version of eeny, meeny, miny, moe.

I'm not saying this to excuse Trump's or anyone else's current or recent behavior. What I'm saying is that this should be considered far more scary than people are treating it. Yes, there is still a racial class system in the United States, but there are a significant number of Americans willing to roll things back to a considerably worse time.

And figuring out the road map to a pre-Civil Rights era really wouldn't be that hard considering that nearly 20% of voter-aged Americans are older than the civil rights act.

The next time someone tells you that racism is dead or downplays ongoing racism, remind them even some of our most progressive leaders took shockingly dark stances on promoting civil rights DECADES after the CRA had already been established.

Even our (hopefully) next president was around 6 years old when George Wallace, the "segregation now, segregation tomorrow" guy, circulated an ad showing a white girl surrounded by seven black boys, with the slogan "Wake Up Alabama! Blacks vow to take over Alabama.".

"Trump said a racist thing back when it was more normal to say racist shit," is a good attempt at character assassination for someone who has character left to assassinate, unlike Trump. Definitely don't ignore these kinds of stories, but focus on Trump's goals and the goals of the Conservatives willing to prop him up as their Popularist candidate. Trump is just part of a system that's trying to turn back the clock at least 60 years, if not 200 years.

Yes, we need to focus on defeating Trump before the next election, but we can't stop fighting if we win. We'll never be able to stop people who believe that slavery is a reasonable means to win at capitalism, but we can still push them back a little bit longer.

Wow, this got way more ranty than I expected. Sorry about that...

[–] someguy3 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

they used to only know the older racist version of eeny, meeny, miny, moe.

Just found these ones interesting:

There are considerable variations in the lyrics of the rhyme, including from the early twentieth century in the United States of America:.[3]

Eeny, meeny, miny, moe, Catch a tiger by the toe. If he hollers make him pay, Fifty dollars every day

During the Second World War, an AP dispatch from Atlanta, Georgia reported that Atlanta children were heard reciting this version:[15]

Eenie, meenie, minie, moe, Catch the emperor by his toe. If he hollers make him say: "I surrender to the USA."

Also you can forget Kramer's outburst. He's not that old. *75, kinda old.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Does it help if I say "it's the version that substitutes 'tiger' with a word that rhymes with the name of the tiger from Winnie the Pooh"?

Also, Michael Richards quickly destroying his career by punching down a decade before Dave Chappelle turned his image into a confusing dumpster fire over the years is just further proof of the white man getting more recognition with less effort than a poc. /s

I really wish I hadn't looked at Michael Richards's Wikipedia page. Seeing how much continued work and recognition he's had made me really sad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

The super racist one my dad used to say is

eeny, meeny, miny, moe

Catch a [slur for black people] by his toe

If he hollers let him go

Eeny, meeny, miny, moe

[–] xc2215x 5 points 6 months ago

Good for Fred.