this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
147 points (88.9% liked)

Marvel Studios

3062 readers
45 users here now

Lemmy


Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.


Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,


Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] morphballganon 75 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I did not have "RDJ comes back to the MCU as a non-Stark character" on my bingo card

[–] acosmichippo 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

watch it be a multiverse version of Tony Stark.

edit: also if this is legit I am disappointed they didn't long-tease the reveal in movies or post credit scenes. this seems very un-marvel, maybe out of desperation. they straight up blew what could have been the biggest and most shocking reveal in history.

edit 2: also, how long until "I am Dr Doom!"

[–] MimicJar 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tony made Ultron as the ultimate defense around the world. I could see the idea going a slightly different way and that Tony being a little more ambitious/evil, next thing you know he's Doom.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I get that I'm in the minority, but I think this is going to not be related to Iron Man at all.

Rdj has range. And Doom wears a mask. I think he decided he was too old to keep playing Tony and wanted to retire the character on a high note, but the movies are fun to make and make him a mint, so when they offered a recast he went for it. But I don't think he'd want to screw with the completed story for Tony Stark's character.

I think RDJ is just going to play Doom, and he'll do a good enough job that no one is going to confuse the characters. Based on his acting choices, that's my guess.

[–] David_Eight 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That just sounds super confusing. I know Marvel has done that with some smaller characters, but Tony Stark is the closest thing the MCU has/had to a main character. If it's not an alternate Ironman it'll just confuse audiences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It will almost certainly be a multi verse Tony Stark gone evil.

[–] peopleproblems 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And I'll bet anything it's Spider-Man that unmasks him and discovers it, leading to a whole mental breakdown by Peter.

[–] morphballganon 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hasn't Peter had enough breakdowns yet?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] pikmeir 10 points 5 months ago

With great power, comes great meltdowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems 10 points 5 months ago

Have you read the comics? If not - Peter Parker is constantly traumatized by shit going horribly wrong or failing to account for something frequently. I'd say it's a running gag but Stan Lee wanted a super hero people could connect with at a human level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paddirn 51 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That seems like something they should’ve waited to reveal during the movie, like had some misdirection about RDJ just being in it for a flashback or a recorded video, just downplay it and make it seem small. Then bust the revelation out midway through the movie.

[–] morphballganon 27 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I'm sure they considered that possibility. But imagine the revenue. RDJ and Doom are both huge draws. Revealing them both in advance gets you more makes money gesture

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Now we can make money and make a shitty movie.

[–] acosmichippo 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

but you can do that in other ways in-universe as they did with thanos and other upcoming characters. its very un-marvel.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pronell 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainSpaceman 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 6 points 5 months ago
[–] MimicJar 32 points 5 months ago
[–] WindyRebel 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t like it. Seems weird. An article I read said that he would NOT be playing a multiverse version of Doom, but actually Victor Von Doom.

Now, based on that I have two thoughts:

  1. He was originally a Tony Stark multiverse version but became corrupted and no longer thinks of himself as Tony so he IS Victor Von Doom (like an identity shift).

  2. He has Tony Stark’s face and will be revealed in a mask off moment. However, the twist is that it’s actually a Doombot and Tony’s face is used to mess with the Avengers. Maybe Doombots can have any face he chooses?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

#2 would actually be a worthwhile twist.

Any of the others... Idk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, they did ask for this treatment with that username.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Veedem 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean it’s definitely odd, but if he’s masked the whole time, then I guess it’s the same as any other actor doing it.

[–] acosmichippo 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

then by that logic why have RDJ do it anyway.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Studio had about 75 million dollars laying around and figured, "what the hell?"

[–] morphballganon 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree with the assertion that we definitely won't see his face, but the star power will be a draw.

[–] acosmichippo 6 points 5 months ago

well yeah that was my point. if they are using RDJ clearly they are going to use him in a recognizable way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CallMeButtLove 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So they're doing a hard pivot away from the Kang stuff after the combination of the Majors scandal and underperformance of Quantumania?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What's the majors scandal?

[–] David_Eight 10 points 5 months ago

Domestic abuse

[–] CptEnder 7 points 5 months ago

They already have, Loki Season 2 was tossed out the window in re-writes because of it.

[–] HomerianSymphony 16 points 5 months ago

Well now. That's a course correction.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

No way lmao. It'll be good I'm sure, but Doom seems like a bigger bad than just one movie. Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

[–] Thatuserguy 13 points 5 months ago

Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

His bed of money wasn't as comfortable anymore, so he wanted a bit more padding

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] esc27 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm kind of weirdly excited because I've been wanting him to come back as Doctor Doom for awhile now but didn't think it would actually happen.

There's just so much room for character drama with our avengers having to make sense of a villainous version of their hero. Also room to play with the dichotomy of stark being a man of science and Doom more into magic.

[–] CallMeButtLove 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Is there a reason you wanted RDJ for Doctor Doom? I haven't read the comics so I'm unfamiliar but I would have expected him not even to be in the conversation. Is there some kind of cannon connection between stark and him? I always thought his link was to the Fantastic Four primarily.

[–] acosmichippo 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tony Stark and Victor Von Doom are entirely separate people. Unless there's some bizarre series I'm not aware of connecting them.

[–] David_Eight 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There was a short comic run where Dr. Doom becomes Ironman after Tony dies that I really liked. The only thing connecting them is that they're both dudes in suits of armor otherwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Iron Man can't be Doc Doom. No.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's actually a multiverse where tony stark becomes doom. Just an fyi

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BJHanssen 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

MCU doesn’t really have a ‘proper’ Reed Richards, so the alternate universe Evil Reed from Secret Wars couldn’t work that way. The only brains of the MCU that could fill that role in that plot would be either Stark or Bannon, and the latter is a) still alive and b) already his own foil and his genius isn’t really played in the same way anyway. B-list alternative would be Hank Pym but he’s not been central to the MCU in anything like the same way as the other two.

Honestly I think it might work pretty well story-wise. Though actual reason is just… well, money. And the course correction aspect previously mentioned in these comments.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›