this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024

222 points (100.0% liked)

News

22802 readers

5343 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

222

Inside the two-year fight to bring charges against school librarians in Granbury, Texas (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by fpslem to c/news

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The law enforcement officer spent months methodically gathering evidence. He leafed through thousands of pages and highlighted key passages amid reams and reams of paper. He wore his body camera to record his interactions with witnesses and suspects. And he photographed what he saw as instruments of the alleged crime:

Books.

The targets of the investigation? Three school librarians in Granbury, Texas. The allegation? They had allowed children to access literature — such as “The Bluest Eye,” by Toni Morrison — that the officer, Scott London, a chief deputy constable, had deemed obscene.

In an extraordinary look into the ramifications of the right-wing backlash against books dealing with racism, gender, sex and sexuality, an 824-page investigative file obtained by NBC News and NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth shows how, for two years, London vigorously pursued felony charges against librarians in the Granbury Independent School District.

London secured subpoenas, filed public records requests, received names of students who’d checked out certain books and, after a year, wrote draft criminal complaints.

Those charges — distributing harmful material to a minor — were never filed. The investigation came to an end in June after Hood County District Attorney Ryan Sinclair turned down London’s request to indict the librarians, citing a lack of conclusive evidence to charge them with felonies.Sinclair declined to be interviewed and did not respond to written questions. London, who has ties to the anti-government constitutional sheriff’s movement and tried to launch a local chapter of the far-right Oath Keepers militia in 2020, did not respond to questions.

...

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] FlyingSquid 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is a summary from Wikipedia about The Bluest Eye.

The Bluest Eye, published in 1970, is the first novel written by Toni Morrison. The novel takes place in Lorain, Ohio (Morrison's hometown), and tells the story of a young African-American girl named Pecola who grew up following the Great Depression. Set in 1941, the story is about how she is consistently regarded as "ugly" due to her mannerisms and dark skin. As a result, she develops an inferiority complex, which fuels her desire for the blue eyes she equates with "whiteness".

The novel is told mostly from Claudia MacTeer's point of view. Claudia is the daughter of Pecola's temporary foster parents. There is also some omniscient third-person narration. The book's controversial topics of racism, incest, and child molestation have led to numerous attempts to ban the novel from schools and libraries in the United States.[1]

I agree with them. Racism, incest and child molestation are obscene. And children need to know exactly how obscene they are.

What? That's what the book teaches them?

Huh.

[–] ChicoSuave 20 points 1 month ago

"We don't like when other people say racism exists. It hurts our white feelings to think that race exists. We are all the same, just don't move into my neighborhood because of what you look like, which probably means you're just like the others."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Isn't most/all of that same stuff in the Bible? I'd love to see a similar investigation into churches distributing obscene material to many of these same children.

[–] Carrick1973 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck that guy. And I'm sure that he did all this while getting paid to actually protect the kids, which he didn't do because he spent all his time in the library. The right wing mindset at this point in time is truly diseased. Obsessed over trivialities; scared of every little new difference that is considered progress by normal people. And how many of these idiots are paid with government positions all while trying to destroy the government?

[–] Kyrgizion 8 points 1 month ago

And I’m sure that he did all this while getting paid to actually protect the kids, which he didn’t do because he spent all his time in the library.

You and I both know that at the first sign of possible violence he'd be the first one out the door.

[–] NineMileTower 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Want to know what's wild? You can tell who someone is going to vote for by whether or not they would say the words, "I support libraries." out loud or not.

[–] teft 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

London, who has ties to the anti-government constitutional sheriff’s movement and tried to launch a local chapter of the far-right Oath Keepers militia in 2020

Color me surprised. /s

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Color me surprised. /s

Colored?! STOP RESISTING!!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The CSPOA unsurprisingly has its roots in white supremacy. The idea started through the writings of Christian Identity (white supremacist) minister William Potter Gale about Posse Comitatus which considered the county sherif as the highest government law official. White supremacist groups continued the idea throughout the 80s and 90s. When I grew up, I had always heard of talk of "constitutionalists" up in the mountains that were fine dealing with the sheriff's departments but claimed they would shoot federal officers on site. The reality is that they were not constitutionalists at all but anti-government racists who tried to hide their racism under a very thin veneer of faux constitutionalism.

[–] TexasDrunk 4 points 1 month ago

The CSPOA unsurprisingly has its roots in white supremacy.

I am shocked! SHOCKED! Well, not that shocked.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’re gonna keep throwing this shit at the wall until something sticks

Somehow, some way, they’re going to start being able to put “woke” educators (I.e. the ones that won’t explicitly give support to their side of the culture war) in prison, if they’re allowed to keep pushing with this.

[–] Kyrgizion 7 points 1 month ago

Depending on the court's reaction, you might already be there. Let's hope some kind of common sense prevails and all these charges are tossed and the cop reprimanded.

Ah well, a guy can dream.

[–] expatriado 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These guys care too much about the availability of certain literature in libraries in this age of the internet. This is pure ideological battle with very little impact, which may actually backfire, making those titles more prominent

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Oh god, in the age of the internet, they're bothered by some spicy literature?