this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
242 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18885 readers
4579 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The (R) grants immunity from anything happening. See all the far worse things others have done, actual breaches of federal laws and national security, with not even a slap on the wrist.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep. I mean… Matt Gaetz just out here raping kids scot-free. Even trafficked with zero repercussions.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Matt Gaetz? The child rapist and child sex trafficker Matt Gaetz? The Matt Gaetz that rapes and kidnaps children?

Each and every Republican that claims to care about the well being of America's children are bald faced liars.

[–] Dusktracer 6 points 1 month ago

I think we just misinterpret the intentions of Republicans and the child rapist Matt Gaetz. You see, they only care that more children are born because then other Republicans like child rapist Matt Gaetz can have more targets.

[–] UltraMagnus0001 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

His big shiny forehead deflects any responsibility

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Boy, would be nice if Kamala uses the whole Immunity From Criminal Prosecution On Official Acts to jail every one of those fuckers once elected

One of the few cases of Cops Abusing Power I'd be for

[–] ohmyiv 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh hey, it's the token GOP minority female who thinks Kamala is a DEI hire. She probably got GOP permission to do this to boost their minority and female inclusion image. What a fking tool, she is.

[–] Mostly_Gristle 25 points 1 month ago

They don't actually think Kamala is a DEI hire They just say "DEI" because they don't feel emboldened enough to openly call her the N-word. You know... yet.

[–] Botzo 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess what we need to take away from this is that Gomez is a DEI hire? Because every accusation is a confession.

Actually I believe she's just in the same class (taxonomy, not wealth) as JD: social climbers willing to say absolutely anything to get a dopamine rush.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

As a Missourian who has had the displeasure of interacting with these kinds of people, yes. Not one of these shitheads actually respects women enough to support her otherwise. I don't even want to know the type of shit they say behind her back.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh oh, she's going to get in big trouble with the rules police.

[–] FenrirIII 3 points 1 month ago

Shame that the Rules Police were the only police department that was defunded.

[–] just_another_person 35 points 1 month ago

She should be in a mental institution. Hope Johnson gets an ethics lashing out of this. Fuck that guy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

another forced, faked smile.

[–] NegativeInf 24 points 1 month ago

"Lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes."

[–] dogsnest 12 points 1 month ago

It was an "official" act!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago