this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
264 points (99.6% liked)

196

16822 readers
2703 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is a real gamer, going for that mad refresh rate on the right and the fabulous view on the left

[–] grue 9 points 2 years ago

Either mad refresh rate or maybe more accurate sprite blurring for emulated old console games.

[–] IDatedSuccubi 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Singleplayer on the left, multiplayer on the right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Not having a CRT monitor is my new excuse for sucking at CS:GO.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You got LCDs these days that go up to 500hz, CRTs aren't the best at it anymore really. Maybe they still have slightly better response times, but even that is a losing battle for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

iirc it's still 0.001 ms on CRTs vs 0.1ms on the best LCDs?

But that's not their main advantage, their main advantage is having absolutely zero motion blur thanks to natural, inbuilt BFI (having one frame that just gives way to another causes some amount of them blurring together in your visual cortex, while if there's a black frame in between that keeps them perfectly separate, and even when running, 90% of a CRT's screen will be black at any given time). Also that natural BFI makes them look a lot smoother than an LCD, like a CRT at 60hz will look as good as an LCD at 120hz.

[–] mceldritch 16 points 2 years ago

This is the monitor setup that I'd prefer. Especially if the CRT can run at 1600x1200 or even 1920x1440.

[–] BallShapedMan 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Digital Foundry did a video on modern gaming on a CRT and it was pretty compelling. I did think about getting one for a bit after that episode.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're a lovely didplay technology, very nice to use

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

^eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The CRT is not the problem, I have two myself, one high-end graphics monitor from 2003 and an average office monitor from 1993.

The issue is having the CRT right beside an ultrawide with no other monitors (like, say, a 16:9 or 16:10 for things that do not play nice with 4:3 or ultrawides), and also the part where that ultrawide is the the crime against good taste that is 32:9

[–] Mr_Blott 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You and I have different definitions of the word "dual"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are only two monitors on the picture, bigger one have wallpaper that kinda makes it look like two separate monitors

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it's not two wallpapers it's been actually split into two monitors with software look at the taskbar it's centred on the middle screen

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Id say split into two desktops, not two monitors. But i love semantics lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Your definition of dual isn't two?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

right monitor is for nostalgia purposes or they just spent all their budget on the left monitor

load more comments
view more: next ›