this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024

347 points (83.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5769 readers

1070 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/[email protected] - General memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp

347

Women on instagram (i.redd.it)

submitted 4 months ago by ooli to c/funny

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] foggy 49 points 4 months ago

"They're super comfortable"

[–] Thcdenton 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

[–] ScruffyDucky 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that pose is called the swallow

[–] Klear 5 points 4 months ago

Swallow, come!

[–] Thteven 21 points 4 months ago

No one disturb him, he's been doing yoga for years preparing for this moment.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They are pretty cool pants.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Legit. I like how the texture looks like a function of the fabric, not a printed-on pattern. Plus the stitching looks solid.

[–] mkhopper 36 points 4 months ago

"I could never reach."
"Reach what?"
"You know...."
"What, your clit??"
"Yeah, it's like you said, 'everyone gets curious and tries it some time.'"
"I never tried it."
" ......."
" Fuckin' pervert.. "

(I know that's not the actual line, but the change fits the photo)

[–] TheHottub 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

From the corner of my eye, I thought this was going to be a picture of The Deep.

Edit: spelling hehe

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 4 months ago

It is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Your I?

[–] TheHottub 2 points 4 months ago

Oops. Fixed

[–] levzzz 11 points 4 months ago

Nanomachines?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

being blocked by instagram because I don't facebook is such a great co-mingling.

[+] [email protected] -42 points 4 months ago (3 children)

"DoN'T obJeCtiFy Us!"

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, maybe don't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

*objectifies self*

Don't objectify me!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, exactly. You're getting there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Cognitive dissonance must be respected.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Different women be saying different things.

[–] Etterra -1 points 4 months ago

Yeah it's almost like they're individuals. Who'da thunk it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that. Did you think I was talking about all women?

[–] Freefall 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Now say "but not all men" in a man-hater post! Double standards, yay!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Wat?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In my mind, it is significantly more likely that someone on the internet is a misogynist rather than them talking about the miniscule overlap between women not wanting to be objectified and women posing in manners that commonly get objectified. In the latter case, I would also expect that someone to be aware of the prevalence of misogynists and therefore distance themselves from them, so as to not be misunderstood. The downvotes you got seem to agree with me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

and "my prejudice is justified" but at the same time "not all women".

Steadfast principles, I see.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Congratulations on technically not being wrong, I guess? I was admitting that, yeah, I made certain assumptions there. At the same time, I tried to provide you feedback that your communication attempt was evidently not successful. But rather than reflecting on that, you're completely blocking that off. Rather than communicating, you're just looking to prove that I'm a dumbass and you're not. Was that first comment intentionally ambiguous, so you could prove you're technically not wrong? Is that your thought of a good time? Because fucking hell, it is not for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is my unfriendly account, where I don't take the time to put breadcrumbs for people towards the path of realizing "all men are X but not all women are Y" is a double standard.

I don't think you're a dumbass. My comments were on your principles, not your intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think that is exposing? What is that exposing and why do you think that is a problem?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Why do you think that is exposing?

Because the dictionary does.

to present to view; exhibit; display:

The storekeeper exposed his wares.

Next question

What is that exposing?

And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that.

Did you even read what I wrote? It's really not that much.

why do you think that is a problem?

Where did I say it was a problem? Quote the exact part of my response where I say it's a problem.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 4 months ago

It was not clear.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure bro, because women share a hive mind.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Funny, I never said all women think like this, but somehow you did. Good projection

[–] Shou -3 points 4 months ago

It's impressive really. I thought men compartmentalized better, but here we see yet another internet stranger incapable of seperating something into "women choosing to" and "women choosing not to."