this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
55 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18936 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't live in Bolivia. Don't know shit about Bolivia.

What we've seen in recent history is that a Military Force talking control of anything will never leave that seat of power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I know very little, honestly it's hard to ever really capture all the nuance, but I do recall having conversations about white supremacist movements in Bolivia with ties to a news corporation operating out of Washington DC, which led some to speculate it was primed for a coup by the CIA during the Trump administration or even earlier. Bolivia elected its first indigenous president Morales, but they were ousted in 2019.

So it seems pretty easy to pick a side, at least from a glance, but there is more we don't know going on than we do.

[–] just_another_person 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look at SE Asian, Egypt, and handful of smaller South American countries. They don't leave.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I wasn't arguing with you, just building on it.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s very complex and involves issues of race, religion, democracy, corruption, economics, etc. But in another way, it’s not complex: Bolivia is sitting on massive untapped lithium mines. Someone is going to get rich from that and whether it’s the people of Bolivia or oligarchs is why coups are tempting:

I don’t know who is backing the current coup, obviously, but I suspect few corporations or Western governments would be upset if a right wing party seizes power (again) despite losing the last several recent elections.

[–] just_another_person 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nope. Pretty simple. If you have an army of people to literally take over a country, you will never leave.

Edit: your X Comment had nothing to do with it. Sad fact, but the US would gain nothing from the changing of hands in El Salvador. Too small, no profit.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] cheese_greater 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I keep hearing it was fake & straight (like staged to bolster approval)

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 3 points 3 months ago

Apparently, that’s what the general allegedly behind it is claiming but I’m not sure I trust the word of “guy who just got arrested for leading a failed coup attempt.” But who knows?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Bolivia’s President Luis Arce called on the country to “organize and mobilize against the coup d’état, in favor of democracy” after soldiers and armored military vehicles positioned themselves around governmental buildings in La Paz on Wednesday.

According to footage from the scene, armed soldiers gathered around Murillo Plaza, a main square in La Paz where the national executive and legislative offices are located.

Morales, who publicly split from his one-time ally Arce, also called on “the social movements of the countryside and the city to defend democracy.” Morales resigned in 2019 following mounting protests over accusations of fraud in the elections; at the time, he claimed he was forced out in a coup.

International leaders including Paraguay’s President Santiago Peña and the European Union condemned the attempted coup.

The European Union said it opposed “any attempt to disrupt the constitutional order in Bolivia and overthrow democratically elected governments,” adding it stands in solidarity with the Bolivian government and its people, according to a post from European policy chief Josep Borrell on X.

According to state media agency ABI, the military mobilization began around 2:30 p.m. local time.


The original article contains 327 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 43%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 3 months ago

But, it couldn't happen here, right?

Anyway, the coup failed and the General ran away.