this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
46 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18043 readers
3141 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Thanks for blazing the trail, climbing the mountain, and throwing down a ladder for me to climb, but fuck everyone else; I'm pulling the ladder up behind me."

-Typical 'I got mine' mentality

Bonus: "Surely the people I'm helping to pull this ladder back up the mountain won't push me off once it's done."

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago

Holy hell. These are some epically stupid motherfuckers lol.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago

From the article: “Beyond ideology, the big consistency is that this is mostly a story of white gay men”

Uh, DUH!

So it’s not generically “queer” Republicans on the rise, it’s “gay white male Republicans”, then they changed the title to make it seem like it’s unexpected.

[–] JusticeForPorygon 13 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I've never heard of this. Are we sure this is an actual thing?

[–] GlendatheGayWitch 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A few years back, some log cabin Republicans walked beside a sports car in the Austin Pride Parade. You could tell exactly where they were because the crowd fell silent as they passed. It was cool hearing the silence move down the street, nobody booed we just ignored them.

There have been members of the community aligned with the far right for a long time. There was even a hugh ranking gay nazi that worked for Hitler before he outlived his usefulness and IIRC ended up in a concentration camp.

[–] cmbabul 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It just further proves that the primary driving philosophy of conservatism is in groups and out group, one to be protected and one to be bound

[–] TheRealKuni 5 points 3 days ago

and one to be bound

I didn’t realize ALL the log cabin republicans were into that.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Jews for Hitler were real. Jews for Jesus are real.

I could believe anything now.

[–] JusticeForPorygon 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not a big religion guy, but how the fuck is a "Jew for Jesus" different from a Christian?

[–] VubDapple 14 points 3 days ago

They aren't but they think they are

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

They're actually Christian/followers of Jesus' teachings.

[–] stoly 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, a lot of people think that they will be considered "one of the good ones". They can't accept that it doesn't matter how much they match the rest of the politics. Being a person of color, gay, etc is all anyone needs to hate you.

P.S. Adding that after the Stonewall riots and getting the NYPD to leave gays and lesbians alone, those upper middle class white gays and lesbians took theirs and ran off. The whole movement fell apart and bi, trans, and others are still suffering.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Yes. For white gay men, but not anybody else