this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
199 points (95.9% liked)

World News

37277 readers
3798 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Chinese coast guard came in small boats with axes, long knives and spears.

They used the crude weapons to slash and puncture the Philippine military’s rubber craft. One Chinese boat rammed a Philippine boat at high speed, severing the thumb of a Filipino seaman who was holding on to the side of his ride.


Video footage isn’t paywalled for those interested in viewing it without a subscription or an archive link.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Crazy. North Korea throwing poop. China going on an axe rampage. Which asylum will take those two please?

[–] Etterra 4 points 6 days ago

Did the Filipino sailors not have sidearms?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that footage of the Chinese and Indian militaries beating the shit out of eachother with wooden sticks because they were worried even small arms fire could cause enough echo to start an avalanche.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

If by "avalanche" you mean "escalation of conflict", yes. They don't allow firearms because of one side shoots, the other side shoots back, then everyone is shooting and it's a real war. Without guns, they have to actually go up and fight the other guy, which is much less effective fighting. A few guys beat up a few other guys, instead of dozens shooting and killing dozens.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What was the fucking point of this? It seems so stupid and petty. Like why even go through the trouble?

I know there have been maritime issues between China and others within the last few years or so, but seriously - what is the fucking point of doing this?

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The very next day, Malaysia's leader praised China.

Make of that what you will.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I did not know this - it definitely adds context. Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

China is probing the US's willingness to get involved in another conflict.

"Stupid and petty" is how international bullies operate. Pointless violence is how immature people express their "strength".

I know there have been maritime issues between China and others within the last few years or so

All of the maritime issues have been caused by China attempting to claim the entire South China Sea as their private property, in defiance of international agreements about national coastal waters. All of those issues were provoked by China trying to exert control over coastal waters that are rightfully the property of other nations, such as Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines. China is a bad neighbor.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“Stupid and petty” is how international bullies operate.

In other words any country having regional or global power aspirations.

Compared with the invasion of Iraq or Ukraine this is actually fairly moderated by China.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's valid to compare a full-scale ground invasion with smashing up a patrol boat. Ground invasions are overt acts of war, no matter how much the invader might want to label them as "special". In this case I don't think China wants an open conflict with the Philippines, not yet anyway. If you're actually invading you don't vandalize one boat with hand tools and then run off, like teenager leaving a burning bag of shit on someone's porch.

This is about China doing whatever it wants, and international law be damned. It's more of a Cartman-esque demand for obedience and submission.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So you do agree that it is a fairly moderated act, compared two how the other two main powers in the world operate, which is outright illegal and mass murderous invasions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

No, I think it's an invalid comparison. Do you struggle with reading comprehension?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Considering the US literally couped Australia when their prime minister refused to give unconditional support for a spy base, this is small fry!

p.s. that military base in Australia now exists, the US has full autonomous control of it, stations soldiers there, and the antennae currently guiding the Israeli missiles leveling Gaza

[–] Womble 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All of those issues were provoked by China trying to exert control over coastal waters that are rightfully the property of other nations, such as Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines. China is a bad neighbor.

China is a bad neighbour, and fuck the CCP. But all the nations around the SCS have ridiculous claims of them controling huge swathes of water way outside their coastal waters. China is just by far the most aggressive about it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Considering that this particular incident happened near the Second Thomas Shoal:

which is awfully close to Philippine territory and nowhere near China, I find your "but-what-about" attempt here specious and shallow.

[–] Womble 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I hardly think its whataboutery talking about the topic in question, the claims in the south China sea. Did you miss the parts where I explictly said China was by far the worst for this?

But you'll also notice that even though this incident is outside the internationally recognised waters of the Philipines it is claimed by China, the Philipines and Vietnam. Despite not being near enough to any of them to properly claim it.

[–] SkyezOpen 1 points 6 days ago

Squeaky wheel gets the hammer, as they say.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Wall Street Journal – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Right-Center

Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual


Country: USA


Press Freedom Rating: Mostly Free


Media Type: Newspaper


Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic


MBFC Credibility Rating: High Credibility

MediaBiasFactCheck.com: About + Methodology

Ad Fontes Media Rating: Middle / Reliable

Article By: Niharika Mandhana

Archive Link: 21 Jun 2024 00:17:28 UTC

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper 7 points 1 week ago

Damn North Blue