this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18931 readers
3144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oakey66 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As someone who is a leftist, I really wouldn't mind having Gretchen Whitmer as the president. From what I've seen, she's been pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Midwestern democrats are actual democrats. If all democrats had their politics and approach, we'd be much better off.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Agreed. 2028 has some solid democrats that will probably run. I'd be happy to vote for Witmer, Shapiro, Newsome, etc.

[–] oakey66 5 points 3 months ago

I would not be thrilled for newsome. He’s a snake that undercut the progressives in his state government multiple times. Shapiro has been decent. I would come out for him for sure. But one thing I know is that the weekend at Bernie’s situation we’re facing right now is about as bad of an option as we can have going into an election year.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Apparently, a new front in the culture war is that conservatives want to drink raw milk now to fight against “big milk”.

This, while cattle are being affected by an epidemic of species-jumping bird flu.

🤨

[–] iAvicenna 1 points 3 months ago

If you tell them that it will act as a vaccine they will stop

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be funny if this idea was started by the Chinese military to get even for Pentagon anti-vax campaigns?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Surely the miss spelled “convicted ex president Donald Trump’s anti-vax campaign”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

So I get what you’re saying. But this was inarguably a Trump admin thing, regardless of which part of the government or military actually carried out the plans. This sounds and feels like a thing he’d do, and in fact fully aligns with his bullshittery of calling Covid the “China virus” in countless press conferences around that time. It’s a deeply stupid tactic, because this is the sort of shit that diminishes the soft power of the US in the long term.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago