this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
302 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

55657 readers
4470 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw 67 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta say, this is “headline of the year” contender material

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Only if it weren’t for the sloppy verb tense disagreement. It should read:

After its reputation goes up in flames, Humane warns users its charging case may, too

5th graders learn how to conjugate irregular verbs. Engadget editors should know better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't it past imperfect though? So it would be goed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“Goes” and “may” are both present participle, whereas “went” is simple past participle. To match “went”, one would have to use the word “might” (simple past participle of “may”). The choice of the word “might”, however, is inappropriate in this context because it is referring to something that would happen in the future (and is less than certain to), and the word “might” typically refers to things that could have happened in the past. “May” refers to things that are likely to happen in the present or future, making it the appropriate word choice.

Also, there is no imperfect tense in English. That would be the continuous tense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Can you help me understand why? Both seem right to me, and GPT is insistent that the original is right

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

“Goes” and “may” are both present participle, whereas “went” is simple past participle. To match “went”, one would have to use the word “might” (simple past participle of “may”). The choice of the word “might”, however, is inappropriate in this context because the headline is referring to something that would happen in the future (and is less than certain to), and the word “might” typically refers to things that could have happened in the past. “May” refers to things that are likely to happen in the present or future, making it the appropriate word choice.

Edit: the verb tenses should match because the first clause is a dependent clause which depends on the second clause which defines the subject “Humane”. If the first clause had been an independent clause, then it would be OK for the verb tenses not to match. Bad style, but not grammatically incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you so much! That makes sense, and since you explained why, I can look up participles myself :)

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I remember being downvoted heavily on Reddit when I called this stupid mostly down to how limited it is and the silly subscription.

Kinda hoping now all those downvoters purchased one because they deserve it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think it would be really cool if it worked like they wanted us to believe it would. Like, it could be one of those “change the way we live our day to day lives” events to the like of of smartphones becoming mainstream.

This device was never going to live up to that or get anywhere close to it, but I can’t blame people for really wanting to believe.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Huh? What do you think they promised that wasn’t delivered that would’ve made this anything that a phone app couldn’t do better? Fundamentally, talking to things sucks, but phones support that anyway. The gimmicky interface is worse than just a touch screen. You have to wear the fucking thing which makes it useless if I’m in bed or whatever. The AI was shit but could just as easily be integrated into an app. It was a shit product from design to execution.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

A device that can do all of the things a phone can do without needing to find and install apps, that can learn from your usage patterns in effective and practical ways, and is unobtrusive to wear all the time sounds pretty fucking cool to me.

That is the promised future that AI devices are selling; I thought I was pretty clear that this device was never going to deliver on it.

[–] UnsavoryMollusk 3 points 3 weeks ago

The thing is, even if the device was doing what they said it would do... It could be an app. In fact it makes more sense. No double network subscription, no need for expensive hardware on top of the one you already carry, expanded acess to the user's data, better hardware in some case (camera for example), more efficient, more integration with other tools (from basic stuff like a calendar to gps etc), and so on.

If AI was a juice the humane pin would be it's juicero.

[–] capital 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t get it. It was so easy to call this, Rabbit, home 3D TVs, the Fire Phone, etc.

What do we see that these execs don’t? Why can I call flops 5 seconds after hearing them but they go on to spend millions to develop products which go nowhere?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 5 points 3 weeks ago

If you can find an angel investor, it doesn't matter. You're an exec getting paid to fail upward to your next project.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

You lost me at Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The subscription makes sense for having LTE access. That’s not really a problem nor hard to justify. Even the concept sounds pretty solid overall. But everything from price to execution was just wildly bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's fucking $24 a month

My basic 4g plan is €3 a month

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And my 5G unlimited plan is $70/mo, but can go as low as $20/mo for 4G prepaid on my network. Seems reasonable to me.

For clarity, the reasonable part is that the pin network subscription is ~$20 here. Not that $20 for 4G is reasonable but that’s a different issue than what we are discussing specifically.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I had never heard of Humane until I read this article. After also reading Engadget's review of the thing, it sounds like an absolute nightmare to use.

Maybe I'm too old-school and impatient, but I've never been able to make voice assistants work for me. It's a feedback loop: the assistant fails to do a task, so I become resistant to using it in the future. Even the thing I've used an assistant for the most, playing music out of a Nest speaker, seems to still be hit-or-miss after years of trying, and in some ways seems to be getting worse.

The gestures also sound awful. As with voice assistants, I've never gotten comfortable with smartphone gestures beyond the most rudimentary. I strictly use 3-button navigation on my phone, and I use Connect as my Lemmy app of choice because it allows me to disable all the swipe commands for upvote/downvote.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I stopped all voice assistants when they started getting snippy with me for being rude to them. I don't need a poorly design if statement snapping back at me for showing my frustration at its inability to do a basic task.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I've never experienced that, and I've definitely told Google Assistant to fornicate with itself on multiple occasions.

[–] Lanusensei87 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~Check out Coffeezila's video on them, the whole things shady AF, in addition of being shitty.~~

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The coffeezilla vid was about the rabbit, not the humane

[–] Lanusensei87 6 points 3 weeks ago

Oh shit, you are right. I can't keep up with all these snake oil sellers.

[–] dustyData 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fortunately, almost nobody bought it, so the risk to the public is very low.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. And it's so bad that I feel like the functionality barely goes down.

They should release the following:

'Out of an abundance of caution, we advise against any user charging this device and attempting to rely on it for communications or regular assistance. Fortunately, we've found a workaround and suggest customers looking to continue enjoying the benefits of the Humane pin consider wearing it down in an unpowered state. This will provide infinite battery life and a 100% reduction in unwanted heating while enabling users to continue to receive nearly all the same functionality to which they are accustomed.'

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What reputation? The company never had one in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Mostly Imran Chaudhri's reputation, really. The guy created the user interface and interaction designs for the iPhone and worked on a bunch of other Apple stuff. Most of the press material i've seen before the release of the AI pin mostly concentrated on him.

[–] ace_garp 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jeffw 2 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, now it'll be stuck in my head all day

[–] serpineslair 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Who wants to run heist I'll give 50% (just kidding I'll kick you after the last setup)