this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
131 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers
3061 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is so dumb. All it takes is one person who gives more fucks about killing him than they do about anything else.

If the deep state wanted it done… he’d already be dead.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The deep state has the technology to fly a missile up someone’s asshole if they wanted to.

[–] FuglyDuck 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A missile with ninja swords that go “schwang!”, even.

[–] Brunbrun6766 2 points 1 month ago

https://youtu.be/WjQCnsmqYKI?si=TIB2MHiQOgP2d2vA

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Ratheon Knife Missle

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The stupid this is the deep state isn’t some hidden cabal of secret actors, they’re hidden in plain sight and the billionaires that hire lobbyists, fund campaigns and basically decide ‘democracy’ as they choose to present it.

The show we’re presented and to argue over is just a distraction to keep us from coming after them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People can't even seem to agree on exactly what the deep state even is. When it first came up, it was career civil servants who nefariously wanted a semblance of continuity so they could do their jobs. Now it's just another cabal of Them. Might as well be Freemasons collaborating with the Trilateral Commission again.

[–] FuglyDuck 2 points 1 month ago

Well yeah.

As they see it, I don’t think it even exists. But that just makes the whole thing even dumber, right?

Assuming that it exists, is the secret service somehow immune? Nope.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

If presidents have total immunity like Trump is arguing in the Supreme Court, then it’s entirely within Biden’s purview to assassinate Trump. I don’t know what Trump is screaming about, this is exactly the power that he wants presidents to have.

[–] eran_morad 7 points 1 month ago

With what? Hamberders?

[–] jordanlund 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Proof time travel does not exist...

[–] L3mmyW1nks 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That, or we might actually be on the fixed timeline that is better than the others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"better" as in "most survivable"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone from 50 years in the future and someone from 500 years in the future and someone from 5000 years in the future might have very different opinions on what the best timeline is.

[–] L3mmyW1nks 2 points 1 month ago

True. Every timeline will try to survive as well, I guess....

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 1 month ago

You'd have to be dumb as a fence post to believe such a thing....oh wait, this is Republicans we are talking about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure Donny's lawyers argued in court this was OK.

[–] Son_of_dad 5 points 1 month ago

But according to Trump's lawyers, presidents are immune from everything, so they can just assassinate at will. So according to their arguments, Biden is within his rights as president to take out Trump

[–] mojo_raisin 5 points 1 month ago

Are they projecting again?

[–] RampantParanoia2365 3 points 1 month ago
[–] tsonfeir 1 points 1 month ago

One conspiracy I’m hoping is true.