this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
10 points (56.2% liked)

science

13604 readers
751 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess you already knew since your phone is working.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (4 children)

For such kind of stories, I would prefer reading an article from a science magazine over a random youtube video. Not everything need to be a video!

I don't know what a Carrington event is but based on context, I'd wager it's probably a huge solar flare hitting earth.

[–] rockSlayer 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I had to look it up, the Carrington Event was a solar flare that impacted the entire globe and caused telegraph stations to set on fire in the 1800s. It's the biggest magnetic storm in recorded history, and would lead to global devastation if another one that size impacted Earth due to our reliance on electronics

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the info!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We know the real Carrington event was a much more severe storm because there were reports of the northern lights visible in the tropics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I know nothing about how any of this works, and so what I am gonna say may be complete nonsense, but If the current one was weaker and the last powerful one was in the late 19th century, then this would hopefully means another "real" corrignton event will at least need more than a century and half to occur.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately for us, the sun isn't an egg timer, and it's pretty much completely impossible to determine exactly when and how strong the next solar flare is until it's hurtling through space and potentially in our direction (beyond general trends like solar cycles and such). Would be great if it worked like that though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

The current model predicts that the peak activity of this solar cycle will be next year. Theoretically, we haven't seen the highest activity yet.

[–] CeeBee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This isn't a "random" YouTube channel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The channel has 1m subscribers. It is by definition a random youtube channel to ~%99.9 of the population.

[–] marcos 22 points 1 month ago

No, we didn't. It wasn't remotely close.

[–] obinice 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Check it out! Technology survived a Carrington Event

Nope, that wasn't remotely powerful enough to be compared to Carrington.

For such an event, we'd have to take preemptive measures to protect our power grids by mostly shutting then down and cutting various interconnects temporarily until the danger had passed, for example.

[–] RestrictedAccount 9 points 1 month ago

Whenever the headline is a question, the answer is always no.

[–] CrayonRosary 6 points 1 month ago

If technology survived, it wasn't a Carrington event.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Using an IQ scale that only classifies scores into categories of 0-49, and 50+, I’ve determined I’m as smart as Einstein.

… which is to say, it’s a bit silly to assume a classification system with a “catch all” maximum is going to produce equitable results in that maximum range. (Not that they are bad systems, just that you can’t compare things in that range without qualifiers.)
Never mind that how directly a flare is aimed at the earth factors heavily, too.