this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
216 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist 75 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Once again, I am introducing a bill that would make handguns legal only for women.

[–] disguy_ovahea 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Mark Robinson suggested our culture tells women to have sex and get an abortion to get out of trouble. “It’s all right to murder someone to get out of it,” he said in 2021. “Once you make a baby, it’s not your body anymore. It’s y’all’s body.”

To which John Oliver replied, “I will say, if the women of this country do think it’s alright to murder someone to get out of trouble, they are currently showing incredible restraint.”

[–] Agent641 12 points 7 months ago

A bear would never do this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

You missed the part where she hurt his feelings. Can’t have that.

[–] Nurse_Robot 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This is happening in my state. I hope a law is proposed to counter sue people like this and absolutely ruin them

“Fathers of aborted fetuses can sue for wrongful death in states with abortion bans, even if the abortion occurs out-of-state,” Mitchell said in a statement. “They can sue anyone who paid for the abortion, anyone who aided or abetted the travel, and anyone involved in the manufacture or distribution of abortion drugs.”

Jonathan Mitchell should have been aborted. He's a stain on the Earth, a waste of resources, and a parasite to society.

[–] Got_Bent 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even be an Uber driver or an airport shuttle driver in Texas the way that law is worded.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This comment helped my wife get an abortion

[–] Naja_Kaouthia 34 points 7 months ago

What in the flying blue buttfuck is going on with this trying to strip women of their privacy shit? That psycho Katie Britt is trying to put pregnant women in an Excel sheet and then there’s this fuckin’ guy.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago

TLDR: money grab

[–] foggy 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lmao. This Collin Davis fella named and shamed himself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As soon as the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade two years ago, anti-abortion activists started debating if and how they could limit Americans’ ability to cross state lines for legal abortions.

The man, Collin Davis, said in court records that when he learned his former partner planned to get an abortion in February 2024, he hired an attorney who would “pursue wrongful-death claims against anyone involved in the killing of his unborn child”.

However, activists determined to end abortion nationwide have launched a series of legislative and legal volleys to undermine that right, often by targeting groups and individuals who may help patients travel.

Alabama’s attorney general has threatened to prosecute groups that help women leave the state for abortions – a threat that a federal judge beat back forcefully earlier this week.

Court records in Davis’s case also repeatedly cite the Comstock Act, a 19th-century anti-vice law that, in the eyes of some abortion opponents, bans the mailing of abortion-related materials nationwide.

Such an interpretation of the Comstock Act, which the Biden administration disagrees with, would result in a de facto national ban on abortions, because clinics rely on the mail to obtain the drugs and equipment they need to do their jobs.


The original article contains 905 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!