this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
53 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

7170 readers
291 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

REMEMBER BREXIT? That time a Conservative Party directed widespread voter frustration at a single easy scapegoat, smothered the public with misinformation, and were rewarded with their biggest electoral victory in decades? Something similar is happening today in Canada.

The scapegoat this time is the “carbon tax.” That’s actually just one part of a complex carbon-pricing policy that imposes a fuel charge on consumers and industry alike while delivering a rebate directly to most Canadians. The principle is simple: raise the cost of something and people find ways to use less of it. But it’s also ripe for slander, because the fine print is so complicated: the amount you pay and are reimbursed depends on where you live, how much you make, how big your family is, and what you do for a living. Plus, while the government calls it “carbon pricing,” most people know it simply as a “tax.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

How about campaigning for better healthcare access and mandatory maximum hospital wait times? Maybe controlling grocery profitability? Housing developer profits?

*checks notes*

Ok, just mad about a rebate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don’t you mean mandatory maximums?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Oh geeze, you’re right. Changed!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If this is going to be a carbon tax election, we can get the wildfires, droughts and floods to campaign against Poilievre?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Given this and next year should be El Nino years, wildfire smoke across Canadian cities would be campaigning against him. Just picture a pipsqueak rally in a city under smog cloud.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yet I imagine the Kelowna area will still vote for a Conservative to be our representative next election, so many people with money and other conservative types in the area. I was constantly checking updates as one of the fires were within like 1-2 km, it was very stressful and I wasn't ever in an evacuation zone. Had everything ready just in case we had to go right away. Granted there was many buildings between me and the fire but it hit pretty fast, so I may have been overreacting but I'd rather be prepared than caught off guard. Will definitely vote for people that want to curb our environmental impact myself but feels like pissing in the wind when looking at vote counts after the election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

They'll blame individuals for lighting fires, and campaign for a water market for "efficient" water usage.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Personally, I'd like a climate change election... possibly coupled with hospital wait times and chopping up monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don’t insult Harper like that

Harper had to reel him in for trying to fix elections

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Isn't Harper the guy who signed away our sovereign mineral and resource rights to a hostile foreign entity?

Is that why we wanted to rename a landfill the Steven Harper Dance and Supper club?

[–] Apollonius_Cone 5 points 5 months ago

Well, we did get two pandas. At least there's that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

So you see how someone that was too crazy for him might not be someone you want to say is just like him

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You'd have to be psychotic and suicidal to not implement a carbon tax.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Alternately, greedy and short-sighted.

There's a metric fuckload of money to be made before the shit really hits the fan. What these shitheads don't realize is that money won't save them once you can't breathe the air, drink the water, or grow the food.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

In the mind of a common sense conservative, money will always equate directly to power. It can not fail because that would mean everything has failed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Time to put voiceovers of Pierre chanting 'axe the tax' on video of homes burning to the ground, orange air, and terrified people driving down a road with forest fires raging on both sides.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I honestly would have let the Liberals get away with not implementing the Carbon Tax if bringing it in would become the turning point for Conservatives to win the next election. But it's hard to really say this with any certainty, these morons would have found something else to latch on. Capital Gains, Immigration, CCP, fucking dental care even.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That shirt has serious don't dead open inside vibes