this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
200 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

7036 readers
31 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mentalNothing 110 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Finally! My chance to be top 100 in the world at something!

[–] Crackhappy 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You're top 100 in my heart. ❤️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is a SW Battlefront that is a month old?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They remastered the 2004/2005 Pandemic ones and apparently did a fucking terrible job of it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Did they really? I just looked it up and it looks exactly the same... It seems like it's just a rerelease but like why? Weren't there still people playing the original battlefront 2 with mods and shit?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I could totally see why there would be a market for it with updated online functionality, a graphical refresh, and a balance pass. The games are still really fun, but their age does make it a little bit of a hassle to play them compared to more modern counterparts. They could also have added a few things like making galactic conquest mode playable online, and maybe some mod management, for example. I'd have been pretty tempted by that. Unfortunately what they did instead seems to have been steal some stuff from a modder and bugger all else

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah I'd love that. I honestly still play the PS2 version from time to time just to play galactic conquest

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

It's not a remaster. It's just a repackaging and rerelease. As per usual with Aspyr's work they did the bare minimum, if you can even consider it that

[–] CosmicCleric 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Thats pretty brutal.

~~Does anyone know why this is?~~

Edit: Never mind. From the article...

has been met with poor reviews due to its price and performance. As a result, the FPS game’s player count is dwindling quickly, now dipping below 100 Steam users.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (66 children)

It was a horrid mess of a lazy release, also stole content from modders.

I’m sure they’ll use this to say people don’t want to buy old games rather than admit they did a shit job and wanted to make bank for it.

The Darkforces remaster looks to be amazing though. I’ll be picking that up at some stage, can’t justify a $43 price tag for a 30 year old title so I’ll wait for a sale.

load more comments (66 replies)
[–] calcopiritus 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Poor performance? It's a PS2 Game, how can it have poor performance.

[–] hasnt_seen_goonies 8 points 10 months ago

The net code is really bad. You see opponents teleport all over the place making the act of aiming and shooting, unfun.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

I didn't even know this was out, so lack of marketing may be an issue as well.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What the hell it's been a month??

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Felt like close to 20 years to me...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I just want to play Galactic Conquest via LAN or online.

load more comments
view more: next ›