this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

United Kingdom

4136 readers
120 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Okay, so you're going to ban targeted marketing and online advertising, right?

No?

Ah, so the plan is to introduce comprehensive support and counselling for stress and mental health issues in young people, meaning they won't have to turn to these things to cope with their depressing, stressful lives?

No?

Ah, got you - you're going to improve the individual lives and prospects of all citizens, creating a utopian nation, so they can each look forward to a healthy prosperous future and genuinely have nothing to worry about?

No?

[–] Doublepluskirk 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or how about investing in and restoring 'third places' like community centres where they can socialise without having to spend money?

[–] Valmond 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, also no.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

I have a bold strategy to dynamically do nothing about it at all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

no we gots to find money for tax cuts and also to buy more weapons and stuff.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Oh good they blamed video games. I was worried that we had evolved as a culture now and had stopped doing that, thankfully not.

It'll be a sad day when GTA isn't blamed for some murder. Or indeed anything at all.

[–] CheeseNoodle 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Definetaly the video games, not TV or the shelves covered in brightly coloured alcopops with names directly marketed at kids.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Video games normalize drinking? Well that's a new one. Final Fight & Tekken normalized eating whole chickens out of trashcans… how long until an article blames them for homelessness?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't even know you could ferment children into alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I can see where you were confused. It's a simple mistake. "Child alcohol" doesn't mean booze made from children. It's alcohol made and marketed FOR children. In this economic report, their numbers aren't looking good.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

We need to get them started earlier and catch up.

[–] lath 13 points 8 months ago

You say worst, they say best and neither side is wrong.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

smh children these days have no constitution and can't handle their alcohol.

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

That's because kids are legally allowed to drink at home after the age of 5. At 16 you can drink alcohol at a restaurant or pub with a meal so long as you're with your parents. Only at 18, is there no restrictions to buying alcohol other than you're not allowed to consume it in public.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

You can consume in public, just not in alcohol free zones. The zones are generally city/town centres where there are usually places licensed to serve alcohol. Everywhere else you can drink as you please as long as you don't get too drunk.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think any 5-year-old is having a beer though

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's illegal for a 5 year old to drink alcohol at their home. That's why I said after the age of 5 which is the law. Plus I was making a joke which seems to have gone right over your sweet little head.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

That was a joke?

It went over my head too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I challenge you to highlight the bit that was a joke because there was no joke you just made a stupid comment.

The fact that you can technically drink alcohol at 5 is in no way contributing to kids underage drinking because no 5-year-old is drinking alcohol. Underage drinking happens because idiot adults are buying kids alcohol it's got nothing to do with the drinking age laws. If they increase the drinking age to 21 like in the United States it would have literally no difference

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe it. There once was a time, that may or may not be a memory, where the bartender would serve you if you could walk up to the bar and order. You also needed money, but a bit of bartering with scrounged flotsam from the quay could cover costs.

[–] Paddzr 1 points 8 months ago

It's also where all social life happened. I got my first job working for a bricklayer at the pub when I was 15.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The study, one of the largest of its kind by the World Health Organization (WHO), looked at 2021-22 data on 280,000 children aged 11, 13 and 15 from 44 countries who were asked about alcohol, cigarettes and vape usage.

Forty per cent of girls in England and Scotland had vaped before 15, and did so at a higher rate than countries such as France and Germany.

“Considering that the brain continues to develop well into a person’s mid-20s, adolescents need to be protected from the effects of toxic and dangerous products.

Unfortunately, children today are constantly exposed to targeted online marketing of harmful products, while popular culture, like video games, normalises them.”

“We’re seeing really high levels of early initiation into drinking amongst boys and girls in England,” Inchley said.

A government spokesperson said: “The health advice is clear: smoking, vaping and underage drinking can be damaging for young people and their development.


The original article contains 636 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

FASD is also a huge issue and the effect it's having on society is both insanely clear and very visible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

No shit tbh, most of us UK folks often have our first drunk experience when we’re like in our early to mid teens and the normalisation and acceptance of alcohol has definitely impacted this. It’s kinda like most ppl don’t see anything wrong with it, despite giving kids alcohol can literally cause issues due to it.

Quite a different case on my behalf though as I was raised pretty strict in my household and wasn’t allowed any alcohol until in my mid teens due to how much alcoholism ran in the family and my parents being scared due to that plus the normalisation of it too, though didn’t prevent drinking outside of home with those really horrid k-cider cans and me taking alcohol from the fridge that they rarely drank (except beer and I couldn’t take it out otherwise shit would happen and it would be bad) and going out with friends with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This is any consumtion at any level. This whole story hangs on if any alcohol consumption, at all, under 13 leads to harm. Something they have one quote on.

“People tend to have this perception that introducing children to moderate drinking is a good way of teaching them safer drinking habits. This is untrue. The earlier a child drinks, the more likely they are to develop problems with alcohol in later life.”

To date, in recent decades, each generation in UK, and elsewhere, drinks less alchole issue than the previous.

https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/31/2/424/5981990

https://www.statista.com/statistics/369808/alcohol-units-consumed-by-gender-and-age-in-england/

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14760-y

I did find:

https://alcoholchange.org.uk/help-and-support/get-help-now/family-and-friends/alcohol-and-your-child

"There is no clear answer as to which approach is best but, overall, there is little evidence that letting children try alcohol makes them less likely to develop problems with it later on. In fact, research has found that children, whose parents allow them to drink at home and/or provide them with alcohol, are probably more likely to drink more heavily when they are older."

So it could be we are heading for a fresh boozing generation after years of decline. But it is not clear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Nice to see the UK at the top of something!