this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
259 points (96.4% liked)

Space

8530 readers
359 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Dafuq they doing over there

[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

SpaceX are on track to launch 130 times this year. The industry competitors launch 6-12 times per year.

I suspect the higher incident rate is related, since you will need to manufacture, roll out, etc.. much more often.

The article also talks about most the incidents being in booster recovery. Only 2 Space competitors do that,

Blue Origins sub orbital booster always returned to launch site and at best managed monthly launch. This rocket hasn't launched in more than a year.

Rocket Lab perform ocean recovery but only launched 11 times last year and only recovered the booster twice.

So its hard to really compare

[โ€“] Carighan 12 points 5 months ago

Still, the specific injuries sound gruesome, like amputations and crushing. And sure, to a degree this just happens if you do something often enough, but we have safety standards for a reason, it's wild to me that this isn't something where safety is paramount.

After all, think about all the product that could get damaged! ๐Ÿ˜‘

[โ€“] Donebrach 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Elongated Muskrat runs his companies like the cyberpunk villain he aspires to be. Wouldnโ€™t be surprised if all the employees at his companies signed over their physical bodies and implants as part of an NDA because he lives in a fantasy land where itโ€™s 2019 rain-drenched fire-spewing-tower L.A.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Of course Elon Musk doesn't actually run SpaceX

[โ€“] fidodo 8 points 5 months ago

Musk is trying to make the US labor board unconstitutional. The reason why is outrageously transparent based on this article. Fuck that monster.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

This image gives me Subnautica vibes.

[โ€“] guacupado 5 points 5 months ago

A previous Reuters investigation found that the approximately 600 reported injuries in 2022 included crushed limbs, cuts, burns, eye injuries, electrocutions, amputations, and serious head injuries, according to the news outlet, which noted that data from prior years are either incomplete or non-existent.

Oh my lanta.

[โ€“] werefreeatlast 2 points 5 months ago

Injuries such as guy got stuck in the rocket during countdown, guy minding his own business when rocket part fell on him and it was still burning. Probably things like that... parking at the wrong place during horizontal engine tests, etc.

[โ€“] masquenox 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This tells me a lot not just about SpaceX but also "industry norms."

[โ€“] Beetschnapps 2 points 5 months ago

TRW got us to from Pioneer to the fucking moon without shitting on unions or massively injuring their workers.

Elon takes his parents blood money and buys Tom Muellerโ€ฆ yet people act like itโ€™s the second coming of Jesus while the same engineers now suffer for his ego.

All so a single trust fund baby can claim land in LEO.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ