203
submitted 2 months ago by negativenull to c/politics
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blazera 83 points 2 months ago

Republicans are just making things up entirely and too many people are humoring them. Impeachment isnt for airing grievances against job performance, its for crimes. This was never legitimate.

[-] Grobmobularb 23 points 2 months ago

Don’t tell that to Cleatus. The inbred GQP target for all this garbage. He won’t understand.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago

How can you have a Trial when there are no charges? Submitting impeachment documents with the words "we don't like him" is at best a cry for help.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear 46 points 2 months ago

Republicans "vowed to retaliate by slowing business to a crawl on the floor."

If they slow any more their electrons will stop orbiting the nuclei of their atoms and they will dissipate into clouds of subatomic particles.

[-] BassTurd 10 points 2 months ago

We can only hope.

[-] kescusay 39 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago
[-] kescusay 9 points 2 months ago

And everyone knew it.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

Senate conservatives led by Lee, the chair of the Republican Steering Committee, accused Democrats of “nuking” more than 200 years of Senate precedent by declining to hold a trial and vowed to retaliate by slowing business to a crawl on the floor.

That's fucking rich. Complaining about dismissing tradition and precedent from the party that routinely shows that they don't care about anything.

[-] joekar1990 12 points 2 months ago

It was rich listening to Mitch McConnell speak about precedent after he helped pack the court.

[-] eran_morad 19 points 2 months ago

The fucking idiocy of it all. Republicans are fucking swine.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Cruz tried to block Schumer’s move to dismiss the charges by offering a motion to send the Senate into a private session to debate the constitutionality of the impeachment.

Pfft, nice try Cruz. We all know who has their finger on the pulse when it comes to the Supreme court.

No evidence? Get the Fuck out and don't collect $200 for passing go.

[-] Rapidcreek 12 points 2 months ago

That is all. Diiiiiis-MISSED!!!

[-] negativenull 15 points 2 months ago

They were hoping for some distraction from Trump's trial. Oops

[-] EmpathicVagrant 4 points 2 months ago

That’s a whoopsie-do

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
203 points (99.5% liked)

politics

17942 readers
3530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS