this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
178 points (97.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6018 readers
900 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Ceramic applique plates.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Shit, China has that Terra Cotta Army!

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 18 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What are they trying to stop with those bricks, small arms fire? Shouldn't the metal plating already handle that? I would imagine they're not using less than like, 3 gauge steel plate, so unless they're using untreated steel I can't see why they would be doing this from a logical point of view. Except maybe a very sad attempt at camouflage?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's a cheap version of reactive armor. i.e. it shatters on impact while absorbing/spreading most of the force.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Ceramic plates have been used in armor for almost a century now for this reason. Bricks are cheaper than mom's fine china I guess.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be credible for a second, nothing. These bricks will stop absolutely nothing.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, they can absorb some of the impact energy from small arms fire, but that's kinda got me wondering why. Like, whats the point of a tank if you have to protect it from small arms fire? I get it with a helicopter or plane, which are actually very susceptible to small arms fire, but a tank is literally designed to be basically immune to small arms fire.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would this work against HESH rounds? A lot of British and Canadian equipment that has been sent to Ukraine uses those

I mean, I can't imagine it's that effective if it does work at all. But it might be the kernel of an idea that someone latched on to

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

everything works against HESH, that's why it's obsolete

[–] Buddahriffic 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their tanks are being used for dual purposes: getting stuck in mud and brick transport. Those bricks can also be used as paving stones so that their tanks get stuck in the mud a bit closer to their destination. But they are mainly meant for the rebuilding effort after the war.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 4 points 2 months ago

Its like when the Red Army was handing out a single magazine to each soldier but a rifle to every 3rd soldier, telling the others "pick yours up off the floor."

The bricks are the ammo.

[–] mojofrododojo 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

they're trying to detonate incoming shaped charges early to prevent the formation of the jet of hot metal that sprays into the tank. these kinds of munitions work best on contact with the turret or hull - their explosive creates spalling, which is pretty much liquid metal fragments that bounce around the crew cabin, perforating mobliks and cooking off the ammunition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think maybe you're confusing two different things?

HEAT is a shaped charge that explodes and compresses a thin layer of metal (usually copper I think) into a tiny superheated lance that is extremely good at piercing armor. There's no spalling involved afaik.

HESH creates spalling by basically being a big explosive that moulds to the armor before exploding, and uses a quirk of how the force moves through the armor to make the armor on the inside break off and bounce around the tank- that's spall.

I'm pretty sure just using bricks like this would be effective against both types of ammo, though.

Maybe I'm entirely wrong idk I'm just a nerd on the internet.

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 2 months ago

the metal a heat round jets into the cabin is made of the turret/hull it was in contact with. the liquid metal that bounces around inside is called spalling. Spall are fragments of a material that are broken off a larger solid body. It can be produced by a variety of mechanisms.

two different types of spalling effect, but the same thing overall.

I'm pretty sure neither type of attack would fail because of a few cm of brick - this is russian magic thinking. Am also nerd on internet, but prior service from an armor division. Tanks are some of the tastiest targets on a battlefield and advancements in RPG warhead designs were a constant source of discussion.

I kinda wish I could go back (the 49th AD doesn't exist anymore but 1st Cav does) and hear what they're thinking watching the battle damage analysis come through. Drones have changed the game so much.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Oh it reacts all right, just not advantageously.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

This is just the first layer of bricks. Once they are finished, they will have several layers with bricks and air, about two metres thick. It will protect against any HEAT type weapons. Smert!

[–] devilish666 6 points 2 months ago

Instead of bricks, why not just use concrete especially if you mix the concrete with bricks or shredded fiberglass In the end concrete made you look like a badass

[–] johannesvanderwhales 3 points 2 months ago

Baseball fans are confused.

[–] mojofrododojo 2 points 2 months ago

Better than the turtle tank. At least the turret can rotate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Surely it reacts when exploded. That reaction being fragmenting into smaller pieces and flying at high speeds in the direction said explosion pushes them.