this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

3DPrinting

15676 readers
90 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] diykeyboards 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sold on this really making a substantial difference in strength, but it seems relatively easy to implement. Hopefully some slicers pick it up as an option and the community can verify.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

More surface area touching, less gaps (air) between layers.

[–] papalonian 7 points 8 months ago

The video did show summaries towards the end of his findings, he admitted that the improvements with his implementation were not statistically significant but if someone made a better process it could be something.

What I think the video could have done a better job explaining was the layered brick analogy. I was confused as first because I was picturing the print as the brick wall bottom to top, and I thought, "well all the layers are overlapping each other, so how is this a fair analogy?" But when I realized the the "bricks" were the layers if the print was sideways, I understood what he meant much better, and was a little more convinced that proper implementation could yield significant strength improvements

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

cura and orcaslicer both do currently idk about others

[–] fhein 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Blog post with the same info, for people who don't like watching videos.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Neat, I didn't realize he has a blog.

For squarespace sites you can get an RSS feed using ?format=rss

https://www.cnckitchen.com/?format=rss

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I was thinking It would be best to simply offset the inner walls in the xy axis, so that the printer lays down the next extrusion in the groove between two of the previous lines. This is already done with the hexagon infill pattern in orca slicer, but not yet available for inner walls. It would also be helpful to adjust extrusion to deliberately create large grooves bewteen the lines. Outer walls and cosmetic features should of course printed regularly.

The advantage to OP's approach would be reduced complexity, less z-hopping and reduced risk of collision with already printed parts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=5hGm6cubFVs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.