this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
306 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35415 readers
652 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even after enabling JS, all I saw waa a white/blank page. They probably want me to enable cookies and/or DOM storage.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Welcome to the world of SPAs. Where every little thing needs its own application.

Damn it, we even have HTML tags that are impossible to employ in their entirety without use of JavaScript. <dialog> is infuriating and is literally two attributes away from not needing JavaScript.

Except on Chrome. Dialog is broken on Chrome and you will have to clean up with JavaScript after chrome’s own half assed implementation.

[–] scarabic 2 points 8 months ago

JS is the web now. Been going this direction for quite some time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The difference between a SPA and any other site these days is simply where the application runs and what languages you can build it with, though less the latter with options like wasm.

[–] devilish666 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wish every website can works without JS like deep web, no JS, no bullshit, lightweight, just pure HTML/PHP/CSS

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Lightweight isn't the word i would use for anything web tho.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Every website that does this, repeat after me:

PROGRESSIVE ENHANCEMENT

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

PERCUSSIVE ENTRANCED MEN

[–] FuglyDuck 2 points 8 months ago

Prorggressive enhancements lead to percussive maintenance

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

The "trust me bro" of webpage design.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Of all the things that might justify needing a SPA framework, serving a page of static news articles is way way down the list.

[–] Keeponstalin 8 points 8 months ago
[–] desmosthenes 5 points 8 months ago

yea I hate this too; RSS is just a tease

[–] jimmy90 5 points 8 months ago

DYK: the new Lemmy client we are writing has progressive enhancement baked in from day 1.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui-leptos

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Around year 2004 I had to stop using lynx.

Sorry but web apps killed web sites.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Wow, it turns out I'm not the only person to have ever used "privacy browser".

I still have it in case some page has issues with Firefox (probably the issue is not actually with Firefox but with the extensions I installed).

I only stopped using privacy browser as my daily driver because it uses WebView which is based on the Chromium engine and therefore makes the Chromium monopoly bigger. But it was still a nice browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

1ft.io displays that article, albeit without many of the images. Link.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

tracking, ads, cookies, probably bot detection, too. they want it all running and enabled.

fuck 'em. on desktop, i just drag over the headline and search via right click menu for an alternate site that re-publishes nyt articles or has one that covers the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It’s a transaction- it’s fine from their point of view as they have to pay journalists. Is there and ad- free pay option?