this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
555 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5425 readers
2535 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superduperenigma 175 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I like that the reflections largely indicate that the text is sitting right on top of the water surface. And then you have this weird, non-euclidean, lowercase 'g' that completely demolishes the perspective.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The lower half of the g is actually folded in a 90 degree angle and lying flat on the surface of the water, which also explains why it has no reflection. Truly a photo manipulation worthy of a first place.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It really showcases that it's almost impossible to find the spot where that g is located.

[–] GraniteM 4 points 10 months ago

You ask me, I think that spot's mythical

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Am I fucking bonkers or does the g not have a clear reflection on the lower half that totally breaks this take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

No no the bottom half of the g is underwater and the light is being refracted

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Depending on when this was, that could have been pretty sophisticated. We wouldn’t think much of it now, but there was a time where I purchased expensive books on step by step instructions for wild text effects. We’d laugh at them now, but they were cutting edge in the 90s.

[–] Anticorp 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Removing backgrounds used to be a highly specialized skill that took hours, or plugins that cost hundreds of dollars. Same with eye and teeth touch-up. It's crazy how automated Photoshop stuff is these days.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cutting things out of an even mildly noisy background was a pain in PS when j went to college

6 months ago I cut out a game character from a really noisy background using a free web based PS knockoff and it took like 5 minutes

I cried a little for the lost time past me had

[–] Anticorp 2 points 10 months ago

I just cut the background out using a free website two days ago! All I had to do was upload it, and some AI system recognized the people and knew how to cut them out. Oh, and it's built right into the Apple photo app now. They can just drag the people and they pop right off the background. It's amazing! I used to have to use the extraction tool, the pen tool, and hours worth of time to get hair cropped out looking realistic. We're living in the fuuuutuurre!

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What are you talking about; this image is legitimately quite a good effect for early-days photoshopping. It's not perfect, but it's perfectly fine for a student project with an enjoyable result.

The pure audacity of the "g", which in honesty couldn't have had anything else done with it without becoming even more jarring and interfering with the readability, only adds to the impact. 10/10

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

The drop shadow is so close but also somewhat distorted, it kind of adds to the comedic effect.

[–] unreachable 10 points 10 months ago

won by not using comic sans

"seems right"

[–] infreq 9 points 10 months ago

Me neither. Especially with that g

[–] RampantParanoia2365 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Me neither. Maybe if you post the entire image instead of cutting off the bottom inch, there might be a clue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

if you look at the corners, they probably did post the entire image. It's the screenshot that crops