this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
265 points (96.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6764 readers
786 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 10 months ago (2 children)

All US aircraft carriers are nuclear powered so no more burning fossil fuels. Environment = Saved 🌱

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I remember reading about nuclear powered shipping vessels being pitched a few years ago.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Given the state of a lot of ships, I wouldn't want these companies using nuclear power

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, a lot of people don't understand how little oversight there actually is when it comes to the maintenance of cargo ships, and how hard it is to enforce the bare minimum.

Most shipping companies are untrustworthy when it comes to anything that might impact their profit margins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s a great YouTube channel that covers shipping disasters: Brick Immortar (https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=-BNDub3h2_I). Haven’t personally verified any of it though.

[–] JustUseMint 2 points 10 months ago

Yay Invidious

[–] mean_bean279 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that most countries don’t have a port to accept a nuclear vessel and don’t want one in their country.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

There’s certainly a cost of doing business. That’s theirs to make.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

lol, there actually was a few, but that is back in ye old days. 1968 - Otto Hans. 1972 - Mutsu. 1988 - Sevmorput (only one still running - but planned decomission is apparently in 2024)

[–] PeterPoopshit 59 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I have an idea. I know it sounds far fetched, probably won't work but hear me out. What if they put large poles on ships and hung a big canvas from each of them? The wind could blow against these, generating free thrust and it can make the ships go faster. Wonder if anyone's ever tried that before.

[–] rtxn 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But what about the oil companies who make massive profits selling the worst, bottom of the barrel, shit-tier bunker oil to cargo ship operators because regulations don't exist on international waters? Won't someone think of the oil companies?

[–] Wodge 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Won’t someone think of the oil companies?

I will, and my thoughts are below.

spoilerFuck you Oil companies. Fuck you up the ass, with a spanner, sideways.

[–] Kaliax 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

👆 This guy is my favourite* British? person on Lemmy. Called their father a God damned 'melt' and shit, and that God damned name! Lol, yeah Wodge, fuck 'em with whatever the fuck a spanner is -- I'm with you!

[–] Wodge 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you. Yes, I am from those British Isles. And this is a spanner.

[–] DoomBot5 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure a ship that can do that will be able to carry at least 1 shipping container, maybe 2 if they're really light. Should be perfect.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Published Feb 19, 2023 12:37 PM by The Maritime Executive

Sailing cargo ships are making a genuine comeback. Japanese bulk carrier MOL is operating a wind-assisted ship. American food giant Cargill is working with Olympic sailor Ben Ainslie to deploy WindWings on its routes. Swedish shipping company Wallenius is aiming for Oceanbird to cut emissions by up to 90%. The French start-up Zephyr & Borée has built the Canopée, which will transport parts of European Space Agency’s Ariane 6 rocket this year.

https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/sailing-cargo-ships-are-making-a-genuine-comeback

[–] DoomBot5 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, wind assisted, not driven. They're getting a bit of fuel savings from the sails rather than operating purely on wind.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

At 90% fuel savings, its the ICE engines doing the assisting. Think about it.

[–] DoomBot5 4 points 10 months ago

That's their aim. I aim to own a fully electric solar powered yacht to live on in the Caribbeans. Doesn't mean I'll ever achieve it. Best realistic values I've seen were closer to 30% fuel reduction.

[–] ikidd 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How do the French always manage to come up with project names that sound like gourmet food dishes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

je ne sais quoi

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

There are actually a few cargo ships using Flettner Rotors. They can't completely power the ship - they require a bit of power themselves for the rotation - but they can noticeably offset fuel consumption.

[–] NOT_RICK 12 points 10 months ago
[–] Philharmonic3 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hey just wanted to make sure everyone knows: there's a cargo ship behind the carrier. This is an illusion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You're an illusion

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Typical capitalist pig dog gaslighting

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

And they can still keep some vstol seagulls flying 🤌