this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
17 points (63.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3686 readers
1109 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Sean Ferrick... if you see this just know that while I am a massive dick and a terrible person I will love you forever please marry me

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I kinda feel bad for Disco fans. I ain't out there to yuck anyone's yums, but it was such a different kind of show to previous Star Treks, I'm not surprised it didn't land well with many fans. And it's become so commonplace to shit on it (for many valid reasons but also some nasty ones and folks with the latter should fuck right off).

I wore a Star Trek shirt to a wedding and got many compliments, one from a guy who explained his favorite was Discovery, even named his cat after Michael, he felt it was really important to him and asked what I thought about it. I got a battery of polite things to say in this situation, but a more drunken attendee practically lept over to exclaim "Discovery? MAN that one blew chunks!! What were they thinking?? Shoulda been another sci-fi show without the Trek name." and, jeez, read the room!

I guess what I'm saying is, we don't gotta all like it, but Disco fans are Trek fans and we gotta be nice to em, they're here for largely the same reasons we are and, hey, maybe one day they'll go back and learn that the best Trek is Deep Space Nine.

[–] FlyingSquid 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I guess what I’m saying is, we don’t gotta all like it, but Disco fans are Trek fans and we gotta be nice to em, they’re here for largely the same reasons we are and, hey, maybe one day they’ll go back and learn that the best Trek is Deep Space Nine.

I've said many times that the best Trek is the Trek you like the most.

I remember when TNG was "bad Star Trek."

I remember when DS9 was "bad Star Trek."

I remember when Voyager was "bad Star Trek."

I remember when Enterprise was "bad Star Trek."

And you will find people who name any one of those as their favorites.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All Star Trek is bad Star Trek until it has aged a few years. It's like whiskey, you gotta let the angels have their share first.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I can't remember where I saw it, some Star Trek documentary, but it was pointed out that the Star Trek people first watched and grew up with tended to be their favorite one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

The same is true for music, types of movies, and pretty much anything else entertainment related as well. For the most part people like familiar things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Oh I promise I'm being flippant about DS9 being the objective best, but you're right.

Disco tried something different and that worked for some and didn't work for others. That's alright. Hopefully they can learn from what worked and what didn't and we can all have more future Trek to enjoy because of it.

[–] ThrowawayInTheYear23 6 points 9 months ago

Star wars prequels were "bad star wars movies" and now they're looked on favorably.

A generation from now, the force awakens trilogy might not be "bad star wars"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Awesome take. I tried to push through, but I similarly just didn't see any Trek in it other than a coated layer. I felt especially vindicated when Strange New Worlds came out so amazing.

No need for hate or anger toward it. We want studios to try new things. I was initially very afraid that it was ostracizing trek fans though. Telling them to f off in exchange for a wider scifi action audience

[–] Stamets 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Honestly? Thanks. That's what bugs me the most. People just shit on Discovery for no reason other than to be an asshole and it's incredibly common place. Everytime the show gets mentioned someone has to come in and say how they didn't like it because it sucked for whatever reason. That doesn't happen with anything else. Can you imagine if I rocked up and said how much I hate Deep Space 9 everytime someone mentioned that they loved the show? Because I do. I cannot stand Deep Space 9. There are characters in it that I love but other characters I despise to the point I can't watch it. Personally I think it messed up a lot and made a lot of mistakes and I don't like watching it or spending my time even really thinking about it which is why I post so few DS9 memes.

However.

I've said I don't like Deep Space 9 like three times in the entire time I've been on Lemmy and it's been in instances like this. There's no reason for me to wander around saying "Hey yeah but like this sucks and for this reason and this is also ass and other reasons". Discovery just became 'cool' to hate and is bashed relentlessly. That's why I posted this video. A lot of the complaints are either unfounded or based on a misunderstanding. Not that there are not criticisms, but things like the dark tone and less utopian society (as you mentioned) are misunderstood. People can like it or not like it. Totally their right. My only hope and wish is that people like it for their own personal reasons from experience that are shaped with the full picture and not just based off of misunderstandings or, worse still, things heard from some random cunt on youtube.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The folks that complain about "pandering" or whatever when Disco comes up are morons, plain and simple. Folks that complain about the writing or style of the show, I think that's got more legs, but it's all been said already and it doesn't serve a great deal of purpose to rehash it.

The actors are great, Sonequa Martin-Green in particular has a lot of really challenging scenes that she nails expertly. Doug Jones is so good at being a gangly alien that it's taken for granted but that's because he's so truly incredible he makes it seem easy. Jason Isaacs plays his role so deplorably he's easy to hate which is amazing for a villain, probably one of the best in the franchise only behind Marc Alaimo or Louis Fletcher. Anthony Rapp and Wilson Cruz have such chemistry on screen, especially in the more mundane scenes they share.

Maybe there will be this kind of retrospective revival for Disco, I dunno. But I do think the actors deserve better than to be associated with the problems the show had, manufactured or actual.

[–] Stamets 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh the 'pandering' folks are completely fucking stupid because in the same breath they'll say how the show ruined Klingons and everything else. Bro, either they're pandering or they're doing their own thing. Which is it? Yeah, if you wanna complain about writing or acting or something that's fine but pandering? Pretty sure if they were pandering they wouldn't have pissed off so many people in the fandom saying they did shit wrong.

Also I have nothing to add to the acting other than Mary Wiseman deserves an amazing amount of props for making a character that so many people on the autistic spectrum identified with. And a character who has had so much visible growth over the series that its astounding. I love that woman, both Tilly and the actress.

Also Oded Fehr. But that's just because he's Admiral Daddy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I always hated the "pandering" argument because it usually was followed by some kind of complaint about social justice. When I was on discord those people would usually end up getting banned.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Off the top ... this is my personal opinion and take ... it's a hot topic and from the start, I'll apologize if I get anything terribly wrong or if I offend anyone.

After several of you encouraged me, I went and binge watched the entire series over about two months. The start was exciting and I was happy to see so many new ideas and story lines created for the show. As a person of colour (I'm Indigenous Canadian) I was also happy to see characters of varied colour, backgrounds, species, orientations and sexualities in the show ... it made sense because a future open world won't just be a cast of uniformly identical individuals everywhere. A uniform group of individuals that all look, act and present in the same way are always painted as villains like the Borg, so why would civilization aspire for universal conformity?

I loved the characters and potential for growth of their individual stories like Tilly, Saru, Owosekun, Detmer, Reno, Nahn ... or the couple of Stamets/Culber, and Adira/Gray

I enjoyed Burnham at first and I loved the idea of a female woman of colour taking a lead of the show .... but to me, they went overboard with her storyline and her personality. In the TOS series, Captain Kirk played a part in events in the galaxy ... he didn't become central in the fate of the universe. I think the problem they had was that Burnham almost became like a God-like character that was central to the future of the entire universe. I like making characters important ... it just gets difficult when you surround the entire universe around one person because then the stories all become the same ... the universe is in danger because of one person, so it can only be saved by one person. And no matter what is going to happen in the future, you know that it will always revolve around that one person.

All the other Star Trek leads were passive participants in a greater story (I've only ever watched TOS, TNG, VOY and some of DS9) ... Kirk, Picard, Janeway, Sisko mostly played roles where they were part of events in the galaxy that involved them but their survival didn't hinge on the fate of entire galaxy or universe ... their stories are usually stories of survival that would have been resolved whether or not they lived or not. Burnham is different ... all her stories revolve around her and the fate of the entire universe hinges on just her, which was exciting the first time ... but lost it's suspense every other time it happened.

But about the most disappointing thing for me in the series was a lack of seeing the character JET RENO. I would have loved to see Reno square off with Stamets more often in engineering and the science lab.

I would love a spinoff show that centred around Engineering with Reno ... and maybe an episode where they could bring together all the Star Trek engineers ... Scotty, Laforge, O'Brien and all the other engineer characters and even throw Data in their too in some time warp multiverse event that unexpectedly brings them all together for a brief moment.

I think that was my favourite part of Discovery .... the potential for more ... the potential to see more of a story from each of the characters that made up the show.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I started hating Discovery. I ended loving it. The things I hated to start off were the retcon of the Klingons and the fact that it felt closer to the reboot films than the previous Treks. But there’s so much to love about it. The story is pretty incredible. It was definitely more intense than previous Treks, the character development was great. There was just enough humor to break things up. The twists were actual twists for the most part.

I honestly think people were hoping for something more utopian, forgetting about the timeframe of the show comes before even TOS, so things are more chaotic. It’s not my favorite Trek, but I think I’d put it around TNG if not above it.

[–] Stamets 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly? Agreed on literally every point. When it was first announced I fucking hated it and refused to watch it. I heard a bunch from other Trek friends and fans talking about how it was pandering with the gay characters and saw some stuff on YouTube backing it up.

I was an absolute moron.

I caved and decided to watch it because I was itching for something new in Trek. HATED the first few episodes. Loathed it. I think it was like the second last episode when Stamets terraforms a moon with mushrooms that I started to finally come around. I started to watch the second season, cautious, and within 15 minutes I was on the edge of my seat with a giddy smile on my face and laughing like a fool.

Discovery is amazing. It's not without its flaws but the hate it gets is undeserved. Lately I've just been saying that Discovery has been getting the Prequel treatment and will continue to do so. Prequels were fucking hated when they first came out. Mocked relentlessly. Child actor of Anakin bullied to a really extreme and depressing point. Now? Beloved. Memed to high heaven. Remembered fondly. Loved. Discovery will get that too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I also hated it....fuckin' hated it! I watched the first three episodes when they aired and gave up. I binged it a couple of years later, and I'm glad I gave it another chance. What got me was the fallout from Hugh's fate in season 1, omfg it was just heartbreaking watching Paul come to grips and try to move on. And Ash, even though he was responsible, got my empathy eventually because of his struggles with all that overwhelming crazy PTSD and repressed memories. Yeah, really glad I gave it another chance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I get the criticism about production, plot, and dialogue decisions. I mean, I agree on quite a few of them. But a good chunk of the detractors are on the hate bandwagon because they just can't stand women/minorities getting representation, and those dumbfucks need to GTFO. It's Trek, for fuck's sake. Yeah, Discovery is different, but I still dig the show.

[–] Telodzrum 12 points 9 months ago

You're spot on. I have so many issues with the storytelling methodology, the decisions about how to treat the ST Universe and its canon, the use of the characters to tell the stories they chose, and more; but, it has been so hard to voice legitimate criticism of the show and the creators' decisions because you always seem to end up lumped in with a bunch of chuds who are just upset about the diversity in the cast (which blows my mind, because it's no more groundbreaking than a lot of other Trek, relative to the time of airing).

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad 13 points 9 months ago

My main issue with the show is Burnham, so I don't think there's anything they can do to fix it for me unless they kill her off and get a new lead. The show has been going long enough, I'd watch one last season, but I think they need to end it and focus on strange new worlds and more shows like that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I stand by Discovery, I enjoy that show. My main complaint is that I could've used more Jason Isaacs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My dad has asked me every new season of Disco if Lorca is back, and disappointingly, every time, I have to tell him no.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I now know my son's lemmy name

Seriously though, he was an amazing character.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I was so sure he's coming back. Him falling into the shroom kingdom left the doors wide open, right? But he didn't =/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

He was my favorite part of the show! If only the rest of the cast/characters were as good/interesting

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (6 children)

ENT at least wanted to be a Star Trek show. Disco banked on the IP for nostalgia and then did nothing nostalgic with it.

I'm fine with people liking Disco or whatever but it's like, the show only got good after they went a billion years into the future and were allowed to thrive in their own sandbox, rather than being tied down in the TOS era.

I would have immediately enjoyed it more if they had made it a post-Nemesis starting point. It would have been more interesting to check in on the Terran Rebellion than it was to check in on the Empire. All that stuff was gross.

Strange New Worlds takes all the new aesthetics established by Disco and actually applies a Star Trek formula to it, and I'm much happier with that show. It wants to be where it is, and it wants to be what it's doing. Intent and planning are everything with media. Disco lacked in both early on, but I'm glad it pivoted.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't hate it, I simply don't care about it.

[–] unreachable 3 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I found every season stylistically jarring on first watch, and it made it hard to just enjoy the first time through, especially since it was the world's first look at what new Trek was going to be like. But on second/third watch, all of the seasons except 1 are honestly pretty good. I'd take Seasons 3 or 4 of Discovery over, say, Season 1 of TNG, all of Enterprise, or season 2 of Voyager, any day. I think for me it's a little overwhelming on first watch because it's A - pretty high concept B - visual smorgasboard C - fast-paced. They'll drop some important ideas or concepts really quickly then it's back to the action. There's no time to let ideas settle in, so you're just suffering whiplash the whole time going from high concept to explosion to high concept to emotional moment to explosion to high concept. It's honestly not bad, I actually enjoy media that's too complicated to really grok the first time around, and it seems clear the fast-paced, high-concept intensity of the story is entirely part of the point, but I think this contributes to its lack of appreciation. Most people are probably gonna need to watch it a few times for the stories to really sink in.

I can throw on reruns of older Treks and kind of relax to them. I need to like, get hyped to watch Discovery.

Tons of issues, won't deny that, but if people can look back fondly on Enterprise, I suspect they'll be look back fondly on Discovery.

[–] bhamlin 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Nice try, Star Trek Discovery producers. You got me to try season 1. Not fooling me again.

If I wanted to watch Star Wars, then I would have watched that instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't have time right now to watch the video, but if you're not on their, Stamets, he'll need to update it to add an 11th reason

[–] Stamets 3 points 9 months ago

He's not. But then again he doesn't know I exist lol

load more comments
view more: next ›