this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
342 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

47509 readers
1354 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 148 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For your convenience:

The researchers pointed out that the vulnerability cannot be exploited remotely. An attacker can trigger the issue by providing crafted inputs to applications that employ these [syslog] logging functions [in apps that allow the user to feed crafted data to those functions].

This is a privilege escalation.

[–] db2 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The hero we need."; DROP TABLE "users";

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

If it isn't little Bobby Tables again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This may be difficult to exploit in practice - I don't think most user applications use syslog.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shadowintheday2 96 points 8 months ago (3 children)

"A qsort vulnerability is due to a missing bounds check and can lead to memory corruption. It has been present in all versions of glibc since 1992. "

This one amazes me. Imagine how many vulnerabilities future researchers will discover in ancient software that persisted/persist for decades.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

That's not the main part of the article, just a footnote, for anyone wondering.

The flaw resides in the glibc’s syslog function, an attacker can exploit the flaw to gain root access through a privilege escalation.

The vulnerability was introduced in glibc 2.37 in August 2022.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So, it must be with the BSDs too?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

C is just crazy. You accidentally forget to put the bounds in a sorting function, and now you are root.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

According to the link in the article, the qsort() bug can only be triggered with a non-transitive cmp() function. Would such a cmp function ever be useful?

[–] Giooschi 4 points 8 months ago

You don't necessarily have to write a non-transitive cmp() function willingly, it may happen that you write one without realizing due to some edge cases where it's not transitive.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Security-critical C and memory safety bugs. Name a more iconic duo...

I'd have kinda preferred for public disclosure to have happened after the fix propagated to distros. Now we get to hurry the patch to end-users which isn't always easily possible. Could we at least have a coordinated disclosure time each month? That'd be great.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

glibc is great, but holy shit the source code is obscured into oblivion, so hard to understand, with hardcoded optimizations, and compiler optimizations. I understand how difficult is to find vulnerabilities. A bit sad that the only C lib truely free software is so hard to actually read its code or even contribute to it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

For what it's worth, glibc is very much performance-critical, so this shouldn't be a surprise. Any possible optimization is worth it.

There are a ton of free software libc implementations outside of glibc. I think most implementations of libc are free software at this point. There's Bionic, the BSD libcs, musl, the Haiku libc, the OpenSolaris/OpenIndiana libc, Newlib, relibc, the ToaruOS libc, the SerenityOS libc and a bunch more. Pretty sure Wine/ReactOS also have free implementations of the Windows libc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Eventually it’ll be easier to create a compatible drop-in replacement than maintain the decades old code, if it isn’t already

[–] FooBarrington 11 points 8 months ago

Unlikely, unless you drop backwards compatibility for undefined behaviour. Unless you write a complete specification on it, you'll end up either breaking old stuff, or slowly rebuilding the same problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Debian (versions 12 and 13), Ubuntu (23.04 and 23.10), and Fedora (37 to 39). Other distributions are probably also impacted.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago
[–] fhein 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-6246

Don't know if Fedora has any similar easy way of tracking vulnerabilities

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

Imagine all the vulnerabilities that privative and low reviewed code has...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (9 children)
[–] unreachable 11 points 8 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Yeah Musl is pretty good to learn C libs but the main red flag is the MIT Licence

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Yikes.

I'd switch to musl on all of my boxes if it weren't that nearly all precompiled software (closed source, games mainly) are compiled against glibc.

[–] Falcon 4 points 8 months ago

Just use flatpak and podman, in a punch you can proot into a different system / zfs data set / btrfs sublime

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's why you need to rock and roll

(Arch btw.)

[–] ouch 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Try having unattended-upgrades with a rolling distro.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't want unattended upgrades >:/

[–] shadowintheday2 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just don't upgrade for a while and you become debian

It's not like windows forcing you to reboot every Tuesday so Edge can come back

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Man, I do this all the time. snapper and grub-btrfs has enabled all kinds of amazing things. I'm so close to just doing:

$ sudo crontab -l
* * 3 * * pacman -Syu --no-confirm

I've got separate offline backups and rescue disks, but I'm pretty confident that grub-btrfs will let me recover pretty quickly.

[–] bruhduh 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

grub-btrfs with timeshift didn't helped me in my upgrade from fedora 38 to 39, when i rolled back with grub-btrfs, what loaded was weird mix of 38 and 39, that didn't even let me browse my filesystem, got to disassemble laptop, get out ssd, use it as external, and even then half of the ssd was locked, ssd was new and chmod didn't helped, even from live usb, had to copy files with testdisk and dd zero's on whole disk for it to work again

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

RedHat and related: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-6246

Not affected

Not affected

Not affected

etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Local attacker

Important detail

as i said on reddit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Glad I only run Alpine

load more comments
view more: next ›