this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
112 points (94.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6598 readers
1024 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

A literal pipe dream.

Glad NATO is taking this seriously though. Makes Trump being rejected at the ballot box even more important.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't think that them mistaking Baltics for Balkans twice and that getting through review counts as them taking it seriously.

[–] NOT_RICK 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This looks like the NY Post fucking up. I’m surprised they didn’t write it in crayon, it’s their favorite snack over there

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

mistaking Baltics for Balkans twice

No, they mistook it for Balkans once. The other time they mistook it for "Balkins".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Bilbo Balkins?

[–] shalafi 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Every professional military war games like this. Non story.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How to run NATO wargames:

step 1: Vague excuse for an intervention

step 2: Horribly cripple your own side for the purposes of actual training

step 3: Make opfor exceptionally competent and prepared

step 4: Results are non-amazing, maybe even a very educational loss

step 5: Read about the mighty russian army beating NATO in NATO wargames

step 6: Read about how russia runs a wargame on easymode with cheats and barely wins, reinforce your beliefs.

[–] Sunfoil 16 points 9 months ago

Yep. A true open war between NATO and Russia, with nukes banned, would be an unbelievably one sided advance into Moscow.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

How the fuck is Russia going to supply 50k troops by air? And how are they going to continue that while people are actively shooting at them? And how is a force of 50k troops, equipped with what I can only assume is the dregs of the dregs of the cold-war reserves, supposed to beat the entire polish/Lithuanian military, even without a thousand european jets dropping bombs on every dogtrail between the border and Moscow.

The main problem of the war would be how to divide up the land between Lithuania and Poland, and me learning the word for "Koningsberg" in two more languages.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

They're gonna use dragons. Noticed how Russia hasn't lost a single dragon since the start of the war? This will become important later

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah it would cause another ”Wilno nasze" thing local Polish keep saying when they try to annoy you.

[–] someguy3 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Number 7 happens as soon as number 5 happens.

I also guarantee you after Russia's poor showing in Ukraine that NATO's planning on holding the gap.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

Number 7 happens as soon as number 5 happens.

Yes, thinking there would be a 6 month delay in response to NATO territory being invaded is absolutely delusional. There would be a Polish flag flying in Moscow in 3 weeks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd call it a wishful thinking, but I think that if things do go their way, they will absolutely try it.

  1. Russia calls up 200,000 more troops

On top of the 200,000 he just did in Nov? Or the 500,000 he did in April? Or was it the 450,000? I don't think it is going to make a difference unless Russia deploys something new.

  1. It launches a spring offensive against Ukraine.

Note: Also have to win the spring offensive, which Russia is still not able to break through. That might change if Ukraine doesn't get it's funding.

  1. Cyberattacks against Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, and stiring up Russian nationals who live in those nations

Note: This was the Ukrainian attack plan too.

  1. Using those Russia nationals as a pretense for saying the (Baltic?) are rightfully theirs a military exercise called Zapad 2024 is launched with 50,000 Soldiers moving into Belarus.

When they say Russian nationals, they mean, using the local population in further meat wave tactics. Whether they want to or not. Either way, if Russia has gotten to this point, then 50,000 is still a very low number. It is going to take a lot more.

  1. Taking advantage of the transition period after the US election Russia claims "Border conflicts" forces it to take control of the (Suwalki Gap?)

Basically he expects there to be discord during the elections no matter who wins or loses. Hypothetical at best.

  1. War with nato. In 2025

And all of this is supposed to happen in less then a year. Outside of China and India joining the conflict, or Russia Pulling out a new super weapon, it's a plan, but it takes into account so many layers and "what ifs" that by the end you are left with a sliver of predictability at best.

I'd bet on winning the lottery over Russia's wishful thinking.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Yes, but to be perfectly honest, February 24 attack on Ukraine seemed quite noncredible to western military intelligence too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That is my point with this post exactly.

[–] NOT_RICK 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Who made this infographic?

[–] Kolrami 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The only somewhat credible English language source I could find for this is NYPost.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/15/news/germany-preparing-for-russia-to-start-world-war-3/

I'm really wondering how this passed the sniff test for some people at the NYPost.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

The NY Post isn't the NY Times. The NY Post is a rag.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I don’t think this “leak” required a sniff tests. Smells like misinformation propaganda. Propaganda in favor of the side i support but misinformation nonetheless.

This thread alone proves that It is serving its purpose.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] NOT_RICK 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’d imagine the Bundeswehr isn’t writing their plans in English so I’m going to assume it was the NY Post continuing to be the joke of a news org that they are.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, Bundeswehr would know their backyard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

No no, that's why they still have soldiers in Kosovo, every few months they send them there instead of Lithuania.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Oh, lmao, I didn't catch that they mislabeled it in the pic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The poor Belkans can't catch a break