this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
272 points (98.9% liked)

News

25312 readers
6115 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 124 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. This is a proposed fine.
  2. "Mar-Jac Poultry's estimated annual revenue is currently $227.1M per year. Mar-Jac Poultry's estimated revenue per employee is $337,500" https://growjo.com/company/Mar-Jac_Poultry meaning that this proposed fine is less than the income this child generated for them.
  3. The child was hired by Onin Staffing, and there is no proposal to fine them. "Onin Staffing's estimated annual revenue is currently $235.9M per year." https://growjo.com/company/Onin_Staffing
  4. This is murder.
  5. This is the fault of Republicans.
  6. They're good with that.
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are there even kids working there? How old was this "teen"? What is wrong with the USA (rethorical question)?

Your numbers (i assume correctness) are making it even more worse. Disgusting even. That's like fines not bound to income. A major kick in the nutsack for the poor and a slightly more expensive, but totally neglectable, parking-ticket for the rest.

[–] FlyingSquid 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Many of them are immigrant children.

https://www.npr.org/2023/05/04/1173697113/immigrant-child-labor-crisis

CNN obviously won't identify the child, but I would not be at all surprised if the child was an immigrant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He told me that he called and asked for help and he thought at least maybe the police would come and check out the house, somebody might come and knock on the door and instead nothing happened. He ended up escaping eventually on his own. When I asked Health and Human Services about this, they told me that yes, they did not have a policy of calling these children back or going out once they were contacted.

Patently HHS didn't think it was important to follow up on phone calls they receive. WTF?

Adam Conover also has a video breaking down the issue.

https://youtu.be/_ve6BqXzbjw

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which would exactly change what? Still a teen that shouldn't work in such a place. Maybe an hour a day filling shelfs in a supermarket. Not working at a deboner in a soul-crusher.

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 1 year ago

It doesn't change anything. It's an explanation of why the kids are hired. They're immigrants that came across the border illegally and are being exploited. They are being helped along by Republican state laws. It's all racism.

[–] RoseRose56 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why they don't just force them shutdown? Unsafe workplace,1 teen died and 1 adult, what else you want ?? Sad just sad. Edited as mentioned on omy other comment.

[–] RestrictedAccount 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The other people who work there see it as their best opportunity.

Let that sink in for a minute.

If you close that place, their life just got worse. Better to fix it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

God that's grim

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not shut down the place liquidate it's asset's and distribute it all to the workers. Fuck that management they created that mess and deserve to pay for it !

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Liquidate the asshats in charge, too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1 teen, the previous was an adult. Not that it changes the heinousness.

[–] RoseRose56 9 points 1 year ago

I thought I it said 2, my fault then! Thanks for correcting me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Three is the charm

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, is that what a teenager's life is worth, combined with the very serious FUCKING HEALTH THREATS of a FOOD PROCESSOR having people DIE in the FACTORY?

Surely this will teach them not to do it again.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least its only the proposed fine, so theres hope they can work it down to a more reasonable amount. I mean, have you seen teenagers?

[–] RizzRustbolt 1 points 1 year ago

Kids these days don't want to work and get caught in a de-boner!

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] RizzRustbolt 2 points 1 year ago

I aimed for their hearts and hit them in the stomach instead.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're being fined for killing a kid? Better remove those pesky REGULATIONS so they won't be fined next time!

-Republicans trying to Protect The Children

[–] PoliticalAgitator 1 points 1 year ago

The neoliberalism that drives shit like this is unfortunately (and genuinely) a "both sides" issue.

The right-wing will be more openly psycopathic about it but ostensibly left-wing parties the world over are still dragging their feet on the regulations needed to force companies to behave ethically.

We desperately need to dismantle the "managed democracy" they've built where the only choices are "red neoliberal" or "blue neoliberal" before they kill us all.

[–] badbytes 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

200K, not even a slap on the wrist. More like a tickle.

[–] maness300 7 points 1 year ago

Worse, it's a green-light for others to do the same.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a childs life is only worth 212,646 dollars to the government?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

No, not at all. That's what TWO kids' lives are worth.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

2 people (one a teenager) killed and there isn't a CRIMINAL investigation?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's it? They should at least get fined for that kid's estimated earnings over a lifetime. Even at the current garbage minimum wage, that would be $750k.

Unfortunately this is likely an undocumented child and there will be no lawsuit over it.

[–] werefreeatlast 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Canned chicken of the land! Now with 80% less teen.

[–] werefreeatlast 5 points 1 year ago

Now with 60% less teen....now 20% less teen....now with 5% less teen...now it just 0.0005% left teens tit (LTT).... Now with 1ppmltt...(part per million left teens tit)...look teen tits are hard to clean off stainless steel okay. That's just life..... McDonald's

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The flavor is better developed, but the texture is quite chewy, longer cooking times and marinades can help. An acquired taste really. Roald Dahl's 'short story 'Pig' sums it up nicely https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_(short_story)

[–] maness300 14 points 1 year ago

after a 16-year-old sanitation worker was pulled into a chicken deboning machine and killed.

What the fuck? What a way to go.

Crazy that 16 year olds are working in an environment that could get them to end up on krudplug.

[–] snekerpimp 14 points 1 year ago

“Price of doing business. Can’t make an omelette without breaking some eggs.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"chicken deboning machine"

hm

erm

don't google that

[–] kemsat 1 points 1 year ago

I 100% read “poultry professor” the first time.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you're paying for the needless slaughter of animals, you're paying for this too. buying animal products is creating the demand, and the machine will keep crushing the innocent and exploited.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or, you know, regulate it for safety like any other industry.

If you're paying for ANY clothing you didn't make yourself, you're paying and driving demand for underage laborers in impoverished countries to make your stuff.

If you're using the internet, that costs electricity and that's (on average) produced by fossil fuels at power generators, spurring on demand for further pollution and destruction of our planet.

The above are examples of silly arguments, but do you see how you might have propped up an unrelated point about veganism/vegetarianism during a story about a dead teenager?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yea, why hasn't anyone thought to make the dismemberment factory a safe place to be?

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just going to sidestep the other points above that talk about exploitation of children and the planet or do you just want to talk about cattle? Because if cattle is more important than those things, please let me know so I can write this off as a conversation not worth having.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you said yourself that they were silly, and I wholeheartedly agree.
but the whole "there's no ethical consumption under capitalism, so we might as well violate all the rights we can!" isn't it.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 2 points 1 year ago

The problem is that I don't believe there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, that statement encompasses the argument of "there's no ethical consumption of meat" which seems to be the one you began with. I'm willing to agree there's an over consumption of meat in US diets, I myself struggle to shove more veggies into my life and cut back on the steaks and burgers, but to frame all meat consumption as "needless slaughter" underneath an article about a teen dying in a processing is drastically tone deaf.

[–] RizzRustbolt 1 points 1 year ago

If properly maintained and running at a reasonable pace, the disnemberment factory is actually a pretty safe place to work.