this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
356 points (98.1% liked)

196

16744 readers
1886 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"it's hilarious because well known kids cartoon icon FUCKS and SMOKES CRACK."

[–] Lamedonyx 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Internet artists "Waaaaaah, copyright and IP laws stifle innovation and creativity!"

Internet artists when something finally falls into the public domain :

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you put 8 billion monkeys on typewriters, one of them is bound to make something halfway decent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Mickey Mouse FUCKING, SMOKING CRACK...... and SWEARING

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The point isn’t to be funny, it’s to ruin the image of the company.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

For people paying attention, the image has long been ruined.

[–] lessthanluigi 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Every shitty 90's/2000's parody movie ever

[–] grue 23 points 11 months ago

Parody is Fair Use and was thus allowed even before the copyright expired. What's new is being able to use Steamboat Willie in works that are not parody.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Whoa, are you implying the timeless classic Superhero Movie isn't peak cinema?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

hearing drake say bitches was worth the price of admission by itself for 9 year old me

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Namely: he has to wear a hat, can't wear gloves, and isn't called Mickey Mouse. He has to be called Steamboat Will

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

The original short is called "Mickey Mouse in 'Steamboat Willie'", so yes, this is Mickey Mouse by name as well. LegaleEagle has a video further discussing the details, TLDR a lot of this is uncharted water, and you may or may not get away with using a modern version as well

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't see why he'd have to wear the hat it's not like it's part of his head why can't he take off clothes or wear different clothes also as for the gloves https://youtu.be/BBgghnQF6E4 look at the walt disney presents and the the end slide he's wearing the gloves he also has the modern eyes rather than the plain black circles maybe they could argue over red trousers and they could absolutely argue over the name but the gloves I don't think so

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/BBgghnQF6E4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] art 13 points 11 months ago

Plane Crazy came out the same year. No hat and he wore gloves.

[–] Frozengyro 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you have him say he prefers to go by Mick, and call himself that the rest of the movie?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I believe Disney would still win that lawsuit even if you had the same level of lawyers and bribery