If Trump is so innocent of all of these charges, why is he so afraid of going in front of a jury of his peers?
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
166 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19105 readers
2804 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So standing on a pulpit and telling his passionate ~~terrorists~~ supporters to march to the Capitol building, all while hearing them chant "Hang Mike Pence", isn't direct evidence of his responsibility for the actions of the crowd he enabled?
This is something I have yet to even understand. And before anybody says it, I already know. It's Trump. Things like logic, consistency, intelligence, and education don't apply. I get it.
But one thing Trump keeps hammering: These people can't prosecute him because they're Democrats. Or their long-lost cousin once donated $10 to a Democrat back in 1968. The Judges can't rule against him because they're Democrats. Or they're Hispanic. Juries can't judge him if they're from blue districts, because that would be biased.
This is coming from a guy who in some cases literally appointed the judge overseeing the fucking case. He literally got to pick his own judge, and he's complaining about bias. Give me a god damned fucking break already. If Cannon were appointed by Biden, Trump would be having a nuclear meltdown over it. But I guess when she literally puts into her legal briefs that Trump really should be above the law, I guess that's perfectly fair.
I really hate this fucking timeline.
You already know so it's not worth diving deep into it, but yes, he'll say literally anything if it serves him in some way. What's more infuriating is having morons parrot it back to you with not one iota of thought occuring...
Can't have a Democrat judge you because bias, can have a self appointed judge on your case because "Trump is smart and picks good people that are trustworthy." Yeah that tracks...
No collision or coordination with a foreign government, that's hogwash and political misinformation, but if it happened it's A Good Thing™ to be on Putin's good side. Oh but Biden definitely worked with the Chinese and that's bad...
I do it with my dad all the time as a "joke." "Hey dad did you hear about how Obama would have Anderson Cooper on voice calls when discussing important thing with his staff? You say that's terrible and he should be ashamed? Sorry I lied it was actually Trump and Lou Dobbs. Ohh Dobbs is respectable so now it's ok? Right, got it."
He literally got to pick his own judge, and he’s complaining about bias.
Yes maybe now you get how tough it is to be Trump, even his own people are biased against him. Sometimes his fingers are biased against him, and his brain too. That's why he says one thing and the next moment he says something else. But the worst part is, that reality is so very strongly biased against him too, that's why he chooses to live most of his life in lala land.
The filings say that his lawyers hope during the trial to point to people in the federal government he suspects are biased toward him, to foreign influence, and to election disinformation that led him to believe the 2020 contest was stolen.
That's a large-screen projection if I've ever seen one.
That's a lot of words to say "Trump plans to lie his ass off and attack anyone enforcing the laws"