this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
639 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18074 readers
3453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump also assured Daniels that he and Melania didn't “even sleep in the same room," she testified

After meeting the future president of the United States at a golf tournament in 2006, adult film star Stormy Daniels testified Tuesday that Donald Trump's personal bodyguard asked if she would like to have dinner with the once-and-future Republican nominee.

"No, with an expletive in front," Daniels said she told the aide in response, per NBC News. But she reconsidered after meeting with her publicist, she said, recalling their words: "If nothing else, you'll get a great story" and "what's the worst that could happen?"

But, according to Daniels, dinner never happened. When she got to Trump's hotel room, she found him in pajamas -- he later changed -- and eager to discuss her work in the adult film industry, where she had risen from performer to director, and whether she had ever contracted and STD ("I've never tested positive for anything," Daniels said).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Does anyone remember that Bill Clinton got impeached for a fucking blow job in the oval office and lying about it on national television?

Yet we elect a president with multiple scandals, including paying a porn star hush, money for an affair while he was married. The hypocrisy in this country is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does anyone remember that Bill Clinton got impeached for a fucking blow job in the oval office and lying about it on national television?

He didn't lie about it. He was very, very careful to make them define all their terms and then answered truthfully based on their exact definitions.

He "did not have sexual relations with that woman" because he made them define what counted as sexual relations, and by their own definition a blowjob did not.

[–] GladiusB 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a lie. Let's not bullshit ourselves. Clinton got away with it because people have affairs. Especially people in power. He wasn't smart about it. He just said what was believable.

I don't think he is even in the same hemisphere as Trump in terms of lying. But this was definitely a lie. I do think that the Republicans at the time were out to get him and it didn't matter. But that's completely different than Trump. That fucker lies worse than a rug.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Nobody believes that he didn't have an affair with her. But he wasn't being impeached for having an affair, he was being impeached for lying under oath. Which he very carefully did not do.

[–] barsquid 16 points 1 month ago

You are able to see hypocrisy because you value truth and integrity.

A Repub values only white supremacist hierarchy, so the idea that they would condemn both or condemn neither is incomprehensible.

[–] mPony 8 points 1 month ago

It's never been about morals. It's about wielding power over others at any cost.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I'm not from your country, and Trump is a nightmare sub-human that needs to be put away, but it wasn't just a blow job and lying about it on tv.

-He (age 49) was her(age 21) boss; there is a level of coercion and power imbalance
-He lied under oath, it wasn't just on tv.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To this day I still think that doesn't count as "sexual relations". If one of my friends told me they had sex with someone and that's all they did, I'd call them a liar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Clinton was a lawyer. He knew to ask for a specific definition and use it against them later.

[–] melisdrawing 3 points 1 month ago

I also remember the absurdity of that case giving him a sympathetic reputation. Like, even people that hated Clinton saw it was crazy to impeach him over something so... intimate. I am worried that puting so much focus on sexually shaming TFG and ignoring the actual crime commited is gonna work out badly. Dude used campaign contributions to settle a personal matter, but har har mushroom-dick.