this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
149 points (98.7% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2995 readers
321 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think this is the reason. He doesn't make a lot of sense.

[–] FlyingSquid 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"I don't have a home, but I'm not homeless!"

Seems like a typical SovCit.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Sorry but he's right on this one. A home isn't just like a house. A mobile home is still a home. If the structure keeps you safe from the elements, contains some of your possessions, and is the place where you sleep usually, then that's absolutely a home

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yet conservatives salivate at the thought of literally destroying similar domiciles that happen to form an "encampment". What's the difference? Why does this guy deserve the dignity of being allowed to own things, while people living in encampments get their shit tossed in and are forced to move location constantly?

[–] PlasticExistence 7 points 10 months ago

They filled the proper paperwork, obviously

[–] Woozythebear 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And democrats don't do this? You think tent cities aren't getting bulldozed with all of people's passions still inside in California? Because they absolutely are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Did I mention Democrats? Read a fucking book.

[–] taiyang 3 points 10 months ago

Isn't that a reason to use the more current term "unhoused?"

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

RVs aren't meant to be year-round dwellings. Especially not the kind you call a camper attached to a truck.

[–] Woozythebear 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well you aren't meant to be working 60 hours a week to not be able to afford a 1bdr apartment but here we are.

[–] FlyingSquid -1 points 10 months ago

I agree, but that doesn't mean this guy isn't homeless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure, but imo it still qualifies as enough to mean you're not homeless. There are other terms that might apply though, like shelter insecure or something. If you have a safe place where you can sleep in, and come and go as you please, and that you legally have the rights to possess, then you aren't homeless

[–] Darkard 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have a home so you can't arrest me!

I dont have an address so you can't send me child support letters!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

The sweet spot.