InsanePeopleFacebook

2663 readers

5 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Lifecoach5000

BonesOfTheMoon

149

Sovcit sent out a "performance" contract, whatever that is. (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by BonesOfTheMoon to c/insanepeoplefacebook

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FlyingSquid 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure the White House paid it extra special attention.

So what exactly did they do this for?

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think this is the reason. He doesn't make a lot of sense.

[–] FlyingSquid 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"I don't have a home, but I'm not homeless!"

Seems like a typical SovCit.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Sorry but he's right on this one. A home isn't just like a house. A mobile home is still a home. If the structure keeps you safe from the elements, contains some of your possessions, and is the place where you sleep usually, then that's absolutely a home

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yet conservatives salivate at the thought of literally destroying similar domiciles that happen to form an "encampment". What's the difference? Why does this guy deserve the dignity of being allowed to own things, while people living in encampments get their shit tossed in and are forced to move location constantly?

[–] PlasticExistence 7 points 7 months ago

They filled the proper paperwork, obviously

[–] Woozythebear 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And democrats don't do this? You think tent cities aren't getting bulldozed with all of people's passions still inside in California? Because they absolutely are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Did I mention Democrats? Read a fucking book.

[–] taiyang 3 points 7 months ago

Isn't that a reason to use the more current term "unhoused?"

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

RVs aren't meant to be year-round dwellings. Especially not the kind you call a camper attached to a truck.

[–] Woozythebear 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well you aren't meant to be working 60 hours a week to not be able to afford a 1bdr apartment but here we are.

[–] FlyingSquid -1 points 7 months ago

I agree, but that doesn't mean this guy isn't homeless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sure, but imo it still qualifies as enough to mean you're not homeless. There are other terms that might apply though, like shelter insecure or something. If you have a safe place where you can sleep in, and come and go as you please, and that you legally have the rights to possess, then you aren't homeless

[–] Darkard 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have a home so you can't arrest me!

I dont have an address so you can't send me child support letters!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

The sweet spot.